Synthesis of heterogeneous nanocomposite catalyst ZrO2@SBA-15 for formic acid production from hemicelluloses

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Heterogeneous nanocomposite ZrO2@SBA-15 catalysts containing 10 wt. % of zirconium oxide were synthesized by two methods: co-condensation and incipient wetness impregnation. The silica support and catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, gas adsorption, FTIR-spectroscopy and other physicochemical methods. As a result of zirconia introduction into the silica wall, the mesostructured of SBA-15 is preserved, but the specific surface area and pore Volume are reduced. It was established that during one-stage co-condensation synthesis, the particle fibers shorten and stick together. The catalysts were tested in the process of catalytic hydrolysis-oxidation of hemicelluloses of aspen wood. The optimal formic acid synthesis conditions were determined: 150°С, 3 h. The highest formic acid yield obtained over the catalyst obtained by co-condensation under best reaction conditions was 28.4 wt. %.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

S. Novikova

Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: snovik.chem@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnoyarsk, 660036

Ya. Shaer

Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Siberian Federal University

Email: snovik.chem@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnoyarsk, 660036; Krasnoyarsk, 660041

A. Eremina

Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: snovik.chem@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnoyarsk, 660036

V. Sychev

Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: snovik.chem@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnoyarsk, 660036

S. Baryshnikov

Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: snovik.chem@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnoyarsk, 660036

O. Taran

Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Siberian Federal University

Email: snovik.chem@gmail.com
Rússia, Krasnoyarsk, 660036; Krasnoyarsk, 660041

Bibliografia

  1. Kresge C.T., Leonowicz M.E., Roth J.C. et al. // Nature. 1992. V. 359. № 6397. P. 710. https://doi.org/10.1038/359710a0
  2. Grams J., Jankowska A., Goscianska J. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2023. V. 362. P. 112761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112761
  3. Reina A., Carmona‐Chávez R., Pulido‐Díaz et al. // ChemCatChem. 2023. V. 15. № 11. P. e202300285. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202300285
  4. Wang J., Wang P., Wu Z. et al. // Rev. Chem. Engineer. 2023. V. 39. № 4. P. 541. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2021-0029
  5. Naranov E., Golubev O., Zanaveskin K. et al. // ACS Omega. 2020. V. 5. № 12. P. 6611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04373
  6. Kokliukhin A., Nikulshina M., Sheldaisov-Meshcheryakov et al. // Catal. Lett. 2018. V. 148. P. 2869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-018-2480-7
  7. Wang W., Zhang H., Zhou F. et al. // ACS Appl. Mate. Interf. 2023. V. 15. № 28. P. 33654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c06165
  8. Ding Y., Peng W., Zhang et al. // J. Colloid and Interface Science. 2023. V. 630. P. 879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.10.048
  9. Ghosh A., Chowdhury B., Bhaumik A. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13. № 2. P. 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020354
  10. Yang G., Wang L., Jiang H. // Reaction Chem. Engineer. 2020. V. 5. № 9. P. 1833. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RE00160K
  11. Tosuwan P., Chen S.-Y., Tateno et al. // Catal. Comm. 2022. V. 170. P. 106488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2022.106488
  12. Mondal U., Yadav G.D. // Reaction Chem. Engineer. 2022. V. 7. № 6. P. 1391. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RE00025C
  13. Li L., Yan B., Li H. et al. // Renewable Energy. 2020. V. 146. P. 643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.015
  14. Chen L., Yan W., He X. et al. // Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020. V. 326. № 2. P. 1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07372-6
  15. Tamizhdurai P., Sakthinathan S., Santhana Krishnan et al. // J. Molecular Structure. 2019. V. 1176. P. 650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.09.007
  16. Tang Y., Chen Y., Wu Y. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016. V. 224. P. 420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.11.053
  17. Sabbaghi A., Lam F.L.Y., Hu X. // J. Molecular Catalysis A: Chem. 2015. V. 409. P. 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2015.08.005
  18. Cheng C., Li H., Fu Q. et al. // Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018. V. 147. P. 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.051
  19. Landau M.V., Titelman L., Vradman L. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2003. V. 5. P. 594. https://doi.org/10.1039/b211585a
  20. Wei Y., Li Y., Tan Y. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2015. V. 141. P. 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.11.066
  21. Ogura M., Guillet-Nicolas R., Brouri D. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016. V. 225. P. 440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.01.026
  22. Chen W.-K., Tseng H.-H., Wei M.-C. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2014. V. 39. № 34. P. 19555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.154
  23. Kaminski P., Ziolek M. // J. Catalysis. 2014. V. 312. P. 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2014.02.005.
  24. Gracia M.D., Balu A.M., Campelo J.M. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: General. 2009. V. 371. № 1. P. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.09.033
  25. Taran O.P., Sychev V.V., Kuznetsov B.N. // Catal. Industry. 2021. V. 13. P. 289. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070050421030119
  26. Mu S., Liu K., Li H. et al. // Fuel Processing Technology. 2022. V. 233. P. 107292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107292
  27. Sychev V.V., Malyar Y.N., Skripnikov A. et al. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. № 24. P. 8756. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248756
  28. Zhao D., Huo Q., Feng J. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998. V. 120. № 24. P. 6024. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja974025i
  29. Parfenov V., Ponomarenko I., Novikova S. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019. V. 232. P. 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.04.087
  30. Parfenov V., Ponomarenko I., Zharkov S., Kirik S. // Glass Phys. Chem. 2014. V. 40. P. 69. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659614010179
  31. Thunyaratchatanon C., Luengnaruemitchai A., Chaisuwan N. et al. // Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2017. V. 253. P. 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.06.015
  32. Gutiérrez O.Y., Ayala E., Puente I. et al. // Chem. Engineer. Comm. 2009. V. 196. № 10. P. 1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440902831789
  33. Rouquerol J., Rouquerol F., Llewellyn P. et al. // Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. Academic press, 2013.
  34. Jaroniec M., Solovyov L.A. // Langmuir. 2006. V. 22. № 16. P. 6757. https://doi.org/10.1021/la0609571
  35. Xi J., Zhang Y., Xia Q. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: General. 2013. V. 459. P. 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.03.047
  36. Luo C., Wang S., Liu H. // Angewandte Chemie Int. Edition. 2007. V. 46. № 40. P. 7636. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200702661
  37. Tikhov S., Mel’gunova E., Mel’gunov M. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2017. V. 53. P. 1322. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168517120172
  38. Huang Y.-Y., McCarthy T.J., Sachtler W.M. // Appl. Catal. A: General. 1996. V. 148. № 1. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00223-2
  39. Rissanen J.V., Lagerquist L., Eränen K. et al. // Carbohydrate Polymers. 2022. V. 293. P. 119740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119740
  40. Borovkova V.S., Malyar Y.N., Sudakova I.G. et al. // Polymers. 2022. V. 14. P. 4521. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214521
  41. Sairanen E., Karinen R., Lehtonen J. // Catal. Lett. 2014. V. 144. P. 1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-014-1350-1
  42. Rackemann D.W., Doherty W.O.S. // Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 2011. V. 5. № 2. P. 198. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.267
  43. Almhofer L., Bischof R.H., Madera M. et al. // Can. J. Chem. Engineer. 2023. V. 101. № 4. P. 2033. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24593

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. 1. X-ray images of catalysts and carriers in the area of small angles. The insert shows X-ray images of catalysts in the area of large angles.

Baixar (155KB)
Metadados
3. 2. Isotherms of low–temperature nitrogen adsorption and desorption (a) and pore size distribution (b) for carriers and catalysts based on them according to the adsorption curve.

Baixar (220KB)
Metadados
4. 3. IR spectra of carriers and catalysts. The inset shows an area of 1400-750 cm–1.

Baixar (276KB)
Metadados
5. 4. Micrographs of the SEM of the SBA-15 carrier (a), SEM and TEM of the ZrO2-SBA-15 catalyst (b) and (c), respectively.

Baixar (204KB)
Metadados
6. 5. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy of the catalysts: ZrO2-SBA-15 (a), ZrO2/SBA-15f (b).

Baixar (340KB)
Metadados
7. 6. Accumulation curves of carbon dioxide (a) and formic acid (b) on the ZrO2-SBA-15 catalyst at different temperatures.

Baixar (166KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024