Indium Oxide–Graphene Composites Prepared by the Sol–Gel Process and Single-Electrode Gas Sensors on Their Base

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Indium oxide–graphene composites (containing 0–6.0 wt % graphene) were manufactured by the sol–gel process. The phase composition, microstructure, and gas-sensitive properties of the prepared materials were studied. The composites consist of isolated In2O3 and graphene phases, where graphene is predominantly adsorbed on the surfaces of indium oxide grains (the indium oxide grain sizes are 8–11 nm). The nanocomposites are distinguished by an enhanced sensitivity to both reducing gases (CH4, acetone) and oxidative gases (NO2). A far greater enhancement is in the sensory response to oxidative gases. Presumably, the major factors influencing the sensory properties of the composite are the high defectiveness of In2O3 and graphene phases, higher specific surface areas of composites compared to those of individual In2O3, and the likely formation of p–n junctions in the indium oxide and graphene contact zone. Graphene additives to indium oxide can improve the main performances (sensory response, response time, and recovery time) of single-electrode semiconductor sensors.

作者简介

Yu. Haiduk

Belarussian State University

Email: haidukys@bsu.by
220030, Minsk, Belarus

A. Usenka

Belarussian State University

Email: haidukys@bsu.by
220030, Minsk, Belarus

L. Rutkovskaya

Belarussian State University

Email: haidukys@bsu.by
220030, Minsk, Belarus

R. Golodok

Academician Roman Institute of Powder Metallurgy, National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Belarus

Email: haidukys@bsu.by
220072, Minsk, Belarus

A. Timonenkova

Belarussian State University

Email: haidukys@bsu.by
220030, Minsk, Belarus

V. Pankov

Belarussian State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: haidukys@bsu.by
220030, Minsk, Belarus

参考

  1. Tian W., Liu X., Yu W. // Appl. Sci. 2018. V. 8. P. 1118. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071118
  2. Pearce R., Iakimov T. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2011. V. 155. P. 451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.12.046
  3. Sun D., Luo Y., Debliquy M. et al. // Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018. V. 9. P. 2832. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.264
  4. Мокрушин А.С., Симоненко Т.Л., Симоненко Е.П. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 9. С. 1336. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X21090063
  5. Wu J., Feng S. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016. V. 26. P. 7462. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201603598
  6. Schedin F., Novoselov K.S., Morozov S.V. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2006. V. 6. P. 652. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1967
  7. Chen C.W., Hung S.C. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011. V. 99. P. 243502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3668105
  8. Yu K., Wang P., Lu G. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011. V. 2. P. 537. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz200087w
  9. Dutta D., Hazra A., Hazra S.K. et al. // Meas. Sci. Technol. 2015. V. 26. P. 115104. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/11/115104
  10. Yun J., Lim Y., Jang G.-N. et al. // Nano Energy. 2015. V. 19. P. 401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.023
  11. Yavari F., Castillo E. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012. V. 100. P. 203120. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4720074
  12. Hwang S., Lim J., Park H.-G. et al. // Curr. Appl. Phys. 2012. V. 12. P. 1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2011.12.021
  13. Zhang Y.H., Chen Y.B. // Nanotechnology. 2009. V. 20. № 18. P. 185504. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185504
  14. Dai J., Yuan J. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009. V. 95. P. 232105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3272008
  15. Salehikhojin A., Esreada D., Lin K.P. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2012. V. 24. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102663
  16. Zhang X., Yu L., Gui Y. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016. V. 367. P. 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.168
  17. Zhang H., Fan L., Dong H. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016. V. 8. P. 8652. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11872
  18. Ricciardella F., Vollebregt S. // Nanoscale. 2017. V. 9. P. 6085. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR01120B
  19. Lu Y., Dan Y. // Nano Lett. 2009. V. 9. P. 1472. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8033637
  20. Zhang L., Li C. // J. Mater. Chem. 2012. V. 22. P. 8438. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM16552J
  21. Huang X., Hu N., Gao R. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2012. V. 22. P. 22488. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM34340A
  22. Zou Y., Wang Q., Xiang C. et al. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016. V. 41. P. 5396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.023
  23. Simon I., Haiduk Yu., Mülhaupt R. et al. // Nano Materials Sci. 2021. V. 3. P. 412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.03.004
  24. Zhang Z., Zou R. // J. Mater. Chem. 2011. V. 21. P. 17360. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM12987B
  25. Yi J., Lee J.M. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2011. V. 155. P. 264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.12.033
  26. Liu S., Yu B., Zhang H. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2014. V. 202. P. 272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.05.086
  27. Wang C., Zhu J., Liang Sh. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014. V. 2. P. 18635. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA03931A
  28. Singkammo S., Wisitsoraat A., Sriprachuabwong Ch. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015. V. 7. P. 3077. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00161
  29. Han M., Liu W., Qu Y. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017. V. 28. P. 16973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7619-6
  30. Karaduman I., Er E., Çelikkan H. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2017. V. 722. P. 569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.152
  31. Kim H.W., Kwon J.Y., Mirzaei A. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2017. V. 249. P. 590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.149
  32. Wang T., Sun Z., Huang D. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2017. V. 252. P. 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.162
  33. Zhou Y., Lin X., Wang Y. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2017. V. 240. P. 870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.064
  34. Bhati V.S., Ranwa S., Rajamani S. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. V. 10. P. 11116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b17877
  35. Ye Z., Tai H., Guo R. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017. V. 419. P. 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.251
  36. Haiduk Yu., Khort A., Lapitskaya V. et al. // Nano-Structures Nano-Objects. 2022. V. 29. № 2. P. 100824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2021.100824
  37. Кулакова И.И., Лисичкин Г.В. // Журн. общ. химии. 2020. Т. 90. № 10. С. 1601. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044460X20100157
  38. Korotcenkov G. // Sens. Actuators, B. 2007. V. 121. P. 664. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNB.2006.04.092
  39. Zhu Y., Murali S., Cai W. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2010. V. 22. P. 3906. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201090156
  40. Новиков В.П., Кирик С.А. // Письма в ЖТФ. 2011. Т. 37. С. 44. https://journals.ioffe.ru/articles/viewPDF/12591
  41. Кричмар С.И., Безпальченко В.М., Мишекин А.А. // Заводская лаборатория. Диагностика материалов. 2008. Т. 74. № 1. С. 21.
  42. Wall M. The Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene and the Determination of Lazer Thickness. Thermo Fisher Scientific, 2011. https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/brochures/AN52252_E%201111%20LayerThkns_H_1.pdf
  43. Gurlo A., Ivanovskaya M., Barsan N. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 1997. V. 44. P. 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(97)00199-8
  44. Marezio M. // Acta Crystallogr. 1966. V. 20. P. 72. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X66001749
  45. Ivanovskaya M.I., Ovodok E.A., Kotsikau D.A. // Glass Phys. Chem. 2011. V. 37. № 5. P. 560 https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659611050051
  46. Поротников Н.В. // Журн. неорган. химии. 1993. Т. 38. № 4. С. 653.
  47. Sobotta H., Neumann H., Kiin G., Riede V. // Cryst. Res. Technol. 1990. V. 25. P. 61. https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.2170250112
  48. Liu Y., Ma X., Wang Sh., Gong J. // Appl. Catal. B. 2007. V. 77. P. 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.07.011
  49. Haiduk Yu.S., Khort A.A., Lapchuk N.M. et al. // J. Solid State Chem. 2019. V. 273. P. 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2019.02.023
  50. Гайдук Ю.С., Савицкий А.А., Хорт А.А. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2019. Т. 64. № 6. С. 594. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044457X19060072
  51. Choi S.J., Jang B.-H., Lee S.-J. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014. V. 6. P. 2588. https://doi.org/10.1021/am405088q
  52. Dey A. // Mater. Sci. Eng., B. 2018. V. 229. P. 206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2017.12.036

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2.

下载 (756KB)
索引源数据
3.

下载 (130KB)
索引源数据
4.

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
5.

下载 (108KB)
索引源数据
6.

下载 (128KB)
索引源数据
7.

下载 (174KB)
索引源数据

Statistics

Views

Abstract: 1170

Cited-by

CrossRef: 1

  1. Гайдук ��, Таратын ��, Усенко ��, Ивашенко ��, Паньков ��. Одноэлектродные газовые сенсоры на основе композита In2O3/графен. Neorganičeskie materialy. 2024;60(1):52. doi: 10.31857/S0002337X24010077

Dimensions

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

PlumX


版权所有 © Ю.С. Гайдук, А.Е. Усенко, Л.С. Рутковская, Р.П. Голодок, А.С. Тимоненкова, В.В. Паньков, 2023