Abstract
In the review offered to the readers, a comprehensive analysis of the new monograph by Professor J. T. Toshchenko “The fate of the social contract in Russia: the evolution of ideas and the lessons of implementation” is carried out. Its theoretical basis is based on existing views on this phenomenon, extensive scientific publications in this field, a wide range of historical information and solid empirical material. It examines in detail the origins of the formation of a social contract in Russia at various stages of its statehood. At various levels of research (philosophical, historical, sociological, etc.), the author analyzes the thorny path of the emergence and evolution of the idea of a social contract, the role of this social contract in strengthening individual rights and freedoms, the development of democracy and the formation of social harmony in society based on mutually acceptable concessions to the government and the people. Another subject of the study is the influence of this regulator of public relations on strengthening the identity of the Russian statehood, the progress of civil society, the deepening of interaction between the state and the people. The book also pays considerable attention to the historical mission of the social contract in the formation of a just society, the preservation and enhancement of the spiritual and moral values of the Russian people, the organic unity of which forms the basis of its Russianness. The reasons for the degeneration of democracy into majority tyranny in some countries, the use of the social contract as a tool for establishing authoritarianism, the suppression of any form of protest by the population, restrictions on human freedom, turning it into a passive participant in the historical process, etc., are also considered in detail. Therefore, in such countries, the legitimate expectations of citizens from the social contract are often not they justify themselves. This is an abstract review of a new multi-vector research by Professor J. Toshchenko shows that it will become a powerful impetus for the further development of both the doctrine of the social contract and philosophical and legal thought in general.
Naturally, within the framework of one publication, it is impossible even to consider the content of all 16 chapters of the reviewed monograph, the total volume of which is 844 pages, and to give a detailed idea of it from various positions. Therefore, the reflections presented to the readers mainly consider the philosophical and legal aspects of the problems of the social contract.