Oil biomarkers: main types, value and applications fields

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Recent advances in modern chemistry provide environmental scientists with the ability to identify and track spilled oil residues in various environments. The compounds commonly used to identify the source of spilled oil are called biomarkers, they are universal in crude oil and petroleum products and are generally more stable to atmospheric environmental influences than most other oil constituents. The distribution of biomarker compounds is unique to each oil. Fingerprint indices calculated from oil fingerprints provide a stable and useful tool for determining the correspondence or non-correspondence of various oil residues present in some environmental samples. This paper highlights the main biomarkers of oil, their role in the study of oil and its deposits, and also shows the results of the authors’ own research.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. R. Babayev

Academician A.M. Guliyev Institute of Additive Chemistry, Ministry of Science and Education of Azerbaijan

Author for correspondence.
Email: elbeibabaev@yahoo.de
Azerbaijan, Baku, Beyukshor highway, 2062

V. М. Farzaliyev

Academician A.M. Guliyev Institute of Additive Chemistry, Ministry of Science and Education of Azerbaijan

Email: aki05@mail.ru
Azerbaijan, Baku, Beyukshor highway, 2062

P. Sh. Mammadova

Academician A.M. Guliyev Institute of Additive Chemistry, Ministry of Science and Education of Azerbaijan

Email: pervin_mammadova@mail.ru
Azerbaijan, Baku, Beyukshor highway, 2062

I. H. Ayyubov

Academician Yu.H. Mammadaliyev Institute of Petrochemical Processes, Ministry of Science and Education of Azerbaijan

Email: ilgar.ayyubov@mail.ru
Azerbaijan, Baku, Khodjaly ave, 30

F. G. Zhagfarov

Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University) named after I.M. Gubkin

Email: firdaus_jak@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

V. А. Adigozalova

Azerbaijan State Academy of Physical Culture and Sports of the Ministry of Science and Education of Azerbaijan

Email: Vkar22@yandex.ru
Azerbaijan, Baku, F. Khoyskiy 98

E. M. Movsumzade

Ufa State Oil Technological University

Email: eldarmm@yahoo.com
Russian Federation, Ufa, 450062

А. L. Lapidus

N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IOC RAS)

Email: albert@ioc.ac.ru
Russian Federation, Москва, 119991

References

  1. Meng H., Moldowan M., Kenneth P. Biomarkers: Petroleum // Part 1 in book Encyclopedia of Geochemistry. 2017. P. 1.
  2. Peters K., Walters C., Moldowan J.M. Biomarkers: Assessment of Petroleum Source-Rock Age and Depositional Environment // Chapter in book Encyclopedia of Petroleum Geoscience. 2917. Р. 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02330-4_9-1
  3. Philip P., Connock G. 10 Biomarkers in crude oils // Part in book The Chemistry of Oil and Petroleum Products. 2022. Р. 449–518.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110694529-010
  4. Chang H., Walters C., Isaksen G., Scharps M. Biomarker Analysis in Petroleum Exploration // Part 2 in book Analytical Advances for Hydrocarbon Research. 2003. Р. 223–245.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9212-3_9
  5. Wang Z., Yang Ch., Zeyu Y., Brown C., Hollebone B., Stou S. Petroleum biomarker fingerprinting for oil spill characterization and source identification // Standard Handbook Oil Spill Environmental Forensics. Second Edition. 2016. Р. 131–254.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 803832-1.00004-0
  6. Misselwitz M., Cochran J., English Ch., Burger B. // Environmental Science Chemistry. 2013. № 2. Р. 1
  7. El Nady M., Naglan S., Sharaf L. // Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. 2016. V. . 25. № 2. P. 263.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.06.009
  8. Garcia R., Cattani A.P., Cunha P., Figueira R., Martins C. // Environmental Pollution. 2019. V. 249. № 6. P. 1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.006
  9. Wang Zh., Stout S., Fingas M. // Environmental Forignsics. 2006. V. 7. № 2. P. 105.https://doi.org/10.1080/15275920600667104
  10. Alimzhanova M., Abdykarimov B. // Separations. 2023. V. 10. № 11. P. 561.https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10110561
  11. Seitkhaziyev Y. Sh., Uteyev R.N., Mustafayev M.K., Liu Sh. // Kazakhstan Journal for oil and gas industry. 2021. V. 3. № 2. P. 61.https://doi.org/10.54859/kjogi89490
  12. Aeppli Ch., Nelson R., Radovic J., Carmichael C.A., Valentine D., Reddy Ch. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014. V. 48. № 12. P. 6726.https://doi.org/10.1021/es500825q
  13. Chosson P., Lanau C., Connan J., Dessort D. // Nature. 1991. V. 351. № 6. P. 640.https://doi.org/10.1038/351640a0
  14. Olea R., Martin-Fernandez J.A., Craddock W. Multivariate Classification of the Crude Oil Petroleum Systems in Southeast Texas, USA, Using Conventional and Compositional Data Analysis of Biomarkers // Chapter in book Advances in Compositional Data Analysis, Festschrift in Honour of Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn. 2021. P. 303–327.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71175-7_16
  15. Reyes C., Moreira I., Oliveura D.F., Medeiros N. // Open Access Library Journal. 2014. V. 1. № 9. P. 1.https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101004
  16. Garls M., Holland L., Irvine G., Mann D., Linderbero M. // Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2016. V. 35. № 11. P. 2683.https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3454
  17. Liu W., Jiang C., Liao Y., Pan Y., Huang Y. // Abstracts of 30-th International Meeting on Organic Geochemistry. IMOG. 2021. P. 1–2.https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202134155
  18. Bocai L., Daxiang H., Meijun L., Chen L., Yan K. // ACS Omega. 2022. V. 7. № 50. P. 47317.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06628
  19. Juval P., Mckenna A.M., Yen A., Rodgers R. // Energy and Fuels. 2010. V. 25. № 1. P. 172.https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1012243
  20. Yingqin W., Xia Y., Wang Y., Lei T., Chang L. // Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2013. V. 103. № 3. P. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.02.003 21
  21. Faboya O., Sojinu S., Sonibare O., Falodun O., Liao Z. // Environmental Forensics. 2016. V. 17. № 1. P. 27.https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2015.1091400
  22. Ashton B., East R., Walsh M., Miles S., Overton R. Studying and Verifying the Use of ChemicalBiomarkers for Identifying and QuantitatingOil Residues in the Environment // Papers of Coastal Marine Institute. Baton Rouge. USA. 2000. 77 p.
  23. Anyanwu T., Ekpo B., Oriji A. // Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2022. V. 14. № 1. P. 33.https://doi.org/10.30495/IJES.2022.1943029.1664
  24. El Nady M., Harb F., Naglaa M. // Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. 2014. V. 23. № 4. P. 455.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2014.11.002
  25. Hsieh M., Philp R., del Rio J.C. // Organic Geochemistry. 2000. V. 31. № 12. P. 1581.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0146- 6380(00)00085-1
  26. Valvayeva O.V., Ryabinkina N.N., Boushuev D.A. // Georesursy. 2020. V. 22. № 1. P. 46.https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2020.1.46-5427.
  27. Tomas J., Acuna A. // Rev. Int. Contam. Ambient. 2023. V. 39. P. 54799.
  28. Dembicki H. Chapter 9: Analysis and Interpretation of Biomarkers from Seafloor Hydrocarbon Seeps // Hydrocarbon seepage – from source to surface. 2013.https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560803119.ch9
  29. Gerald J., Yuling H., Prabhakar C. Fate of hopane biomarkers during in-situ burning of crude oil – A laboratory-scale study // Papers of Auburn University. USA. 2018. 24 p.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X18304338
  30. Babayev E.R., Mammadova P.Sh., Hashimova U.F., Adigozalova V.A. // Macroheterocycles. 2018. V. 11. № 1. P. 111.https://doi.org/10.6060/mhc171262b
  31. Waples D.W., Machihara T. // Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 1990. V. 38. № 3. P. 357–380. https://doi.org/10.35767/gscpgbull.38.3.357
  32. Czochanska Z., Gilbert T.D., Philp R.P., Sheppard C.M. // Organic Geochemistry. 1988. V. 12. № 2. P. 123–135.https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-
  33. Paraskevi M., Nelson R., Reddy Ch., Teske A. // Communications Earth and Environment. 2022. V. 3. P. 250–257.
  34. Frontera-Suau R., Bost F.D., McDonald Th.J., Morris P. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002. V. 36. № 21. P. 4585–4592. https://doi.org/10.1021/es025894x
  35. Gagni S., Cam D. // Chemosphere. 2007. V. 67. № 10. P. 1975–1981.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.062
  36. Wang G., Chang X., Wang T-G., Simoneit R.T. // Organic Geochemistry. 2015. V. 78. P. 110–120.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.11.004
  37. Zumberge J.E. // Geochimica and Cosmochimica Acta. 1987. V. 51. № 6. P. 1625–1637.
  38. Burhanuddan M.S., Maulana A., Jaya A. // IOP Conference Series. Environmental and Earth Sciences. 2021. V. 921. P. 12026–12031.https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/921/1/012026
  39. Wang A., Chunyu L., Long L., Renhai P. // Front. Earth Sci. 2023. V. 11. P. 324–329.https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1128692.40

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Countries.

Download (77KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Fitted.

Download (52KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. The pier.

Download (19KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Fitan.

Download (17KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 5. Hoppen.

Download (53KB)
Indexing metadata
7. Fig. 6. Some biomarkers of the oils of western and southern Kazakhstan [10].

Download (124KB)
Indexing metadata
8. Fig. 7. The railing.

Download (76KB)
Indexing metadata
9. Fig. 8. Driman.

Download (42KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences