DIRECTOR DISTRIBUTION IN A CLC HYBRID CELL WITH A SMALL HELICOIDAL PITCH

N. M. Shtykov; Штыков Н. М.; S. P. Palto; Палто С. П.; B. A. Umanskii; Уманский Б. А.; D. O. Rybakov; Рыбаков Д. О.; I. V. Simdyankin; Симдянкин И. В.

doi:10.31857/S0023476122060212

DIRECTOR DISTRIBUTION IN A CLC HYBRID CELL WITH A SMALL HELICOIDAL PITCH

作者: Shtykov N.M.¹, Palto S.P.¹, Umanskii B.A.¹, Rybakov D.O.¹, Simdyankin I.V.¹
隶属关系:
1. Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography, Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics,”Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119333 Russia
期: 卷 68, 编号 1 (2023)
页面: 77-85
栏目: ЖИДКИЕ КРИСТАЛЛЫ
URL: https://rjmseer.com/0023-4761/article/view/673551
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023476122060212
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DMUGPI
ID: 673551

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅或者付费存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

Laser light emission in dye-doped chiral liquid crystals (CLCs) has been experimentally demonstrated for the homeotropic–planar (hybrid) orientation. A numerical simulation of this structure showed that the helicoid (helix) pitch period in CLC in the hybrid cell and the director distribution depend significantly on the anchoring energy at the homeotropic sample boundary. The anchoring energy plays the role of a factor facilitating the CLC helix unwinding. The lower anchoring energy, the smaller the pitch is and the closer to the natural CLC pitch it is. In this case, the length of the “screw"-type structure near the homeotropic cell boundary decreases. Thus, as the anchoring energy at the hybrid-cell homeotropic boundary decreases, the director distribution in the cell approaches the distribution in the planar (Grandjean) cell. This is confirmed by the laser light emission in the same spectral range as in the planar cell.

关键词

CHIRAL LIQUID CRYSTALS

参考

de Gennes P.G., Prost J. The physics of liquid crystals. 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. 614 p.
Chilaya G. Cholesteric liquid crystals: properties and applications. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013. 112 c.
Kopp V.I., Zhang Z.-Q., Genack A.Z. // Prog. Quantum Electron. 2003. V. 27. P. 369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6727(03)00003-X
Kogelnik H., Shank C.V. // J. Appl. Phys. 1972. V. 43. P. 2327. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1661499
Belyakov V.A. // J. Lasers Opt. Photon. 2017. V. 4. P. 153. https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-410X.1000153
Il'chishin I.P., Tikhonov E.A., Shpak M.T., Doroshkin A.A. // JETP Lett. 1976. V. 24. P. 303.
Coles H., Morris S. // Nat. Photon. 2010. V. 4. P. 676.
Blinov L.M., Bartolino R. // Liquid Crystal Microlasers. Transworld Research Network, 2010. P. 270.
Palto S.P. // JETP. 2006. V. 103. P. 472.
Palto S.P., Shtykov N.M., Umanskii B.A., Barnik M.I. // J. Appl. Phys. 2012. V. 112. P. 013105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4723641
Ortega J., Folcia C.L., Etxebarria J. // Materials. 2018. V. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010005
Nastishin Yu.A., Dudok T.H., Hrabchak V.I. et al. // Ukr. J. Phys. Opt. 2017. V. 18. P. 121. https://doi.org/10.3116/16091833/18/3/121/2017
Dozov I., Penchev I. // J. Phys. France. 1986. V. 47. P. 373. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01986004703037300
Lewis M.R., Wiltshire M.C.K. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987. V. 51. P. 1197. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.98731
Lin Ch.-H., Chiang R.-H., Liu Sh.-H. et al. // Opt. Express. 2012. V. 20. P. 26837. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.026837
Nose T., Miyanishi T., Aizawa Y. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2010. V. 49. P. 051701.
Shiyanovskii S.V., Lavrentovich O.D. // SID Intnl. Digest Tech. Papers. 2003. V. 34. P. 664.
Hsiao Yu-Ch., Timofeev I.V., Zyryanov V.Ya., Lee W. // Opt. Mat. Express. 2015. V. 5. P. 2715. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.5.002715
Блинов Л.М., Раджабов Д.З., Собачюс Д.Б., Яблонский С.В. // ЖЭТФ. 1991. Т. 53. С. 223.