Effect of Substituent Position on Saturated Vapor Pressure of Tetrafluorosubstituted Zinc Phthalocyanines

D. V. Bonegardt; Бонегардт Д. В.; S. V. Trubin; Трубин С. В.; A. S. Sukhikh; Сухих А. С.; D. D. Klyamer; Клямер Д. Д.; T. V. Basova; Басова Т. В.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X22601614

Effect of Substituent Position on Saturated Vapor Pressure of Tetrafluorosubstituted Zinc Phthalocyanines

Authors: Bonegardt D.V.¹, Trubin S.V.¹, Sukhikh A.S.¹, Klyamer D.D.¹, Basova T.V.¹
Affiliations:
1. Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 68, No 2 (2023)
Pages: 181-190
Section: КООРДИНАЦИОННЫЕ СОЕДИНЕНИЯ
URL: https://rjmseer.com/0044-457X/article/view/665302
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22601614
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LQZYWW
ID: 665302

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract

This work is devoted to the study of the effect of the position of fluorine substituents in the molecules of tetrafluorosubstituted zinc phthalocyanines on their saturated vapor pressure. For this purpose, the temperature dependence of the saturated vapor pressure of zinc phthalocyanines with fluorine substituents in the peripheral (ZnPcF4-p) and non-peripheral (ZnPcF4-np) positions of the phthalocyanine ring has been studied by the Knudsen method with mass spectrometric recording of the composition of the gas phase and the thermodynamic parameters of vaporization were calculated. The data obtained for ZnPcF4-p and ZnPcF4-np with unsubstituted and hexadecafluorosubstituted zinc phthalocyanines are compared in terms of analysis of intermolecular interactions in the crystals of these compounds. It has been shown that tetrafluorosubstituted phthalocyanines have a higher vapor pressure than their unsubstituted (ZnPc) and hexadecafluorosubstituted (ZnPcF16) derivatives. In this case, the enthalpy of sublimation increases in the series ZnPcF4-p < ZnPcF4-np < ZnPc < ZnPcF16.

Keywords

zinc phthalocyanine, fluorine-substituted phthalocyanine, saturated vapor pressure, sublimation enthalpy, intermolecular interactions

References

Wang H., Wu Q., Cheng L. et al. // Energy Storage Mater. 2022. V. 52. P. 495.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENSM.2022.08.022
Kumar A., Kumar Vashistha V., Kumar Das D. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021. V. 431. P. 213678. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCR.2020.213678
Nyokong T. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007. V. 251. № 13–14 Spec. Iss. P. 1707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.011
Gorbunova Y.G., Martynov A.G., Birin K.P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 2. P. 202. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621020091
Jiang H., Hu P., Ye J. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2017. V. 29. № 10. P. 1605053. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605053
Brinkmann H., Kelting C., Makarov S. et al. // Phys. Status Solidi: Appl. Mater. Sci. 2008. V. 205. № 3. P. 409. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200723391
Gupta H., Mahajan A., Bedi R.K. // Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2008. V. 46. № 6. P. 435.
Raveendra Kiran M., Ulla H., Satyanarayan M.N. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2019. V. 96. P. 109348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109348
Ilgün C., Sevim A.M., Çakar S. et al. // Sol. Energy. 2021. V. 218. P. 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLENER.2021.02.042
Acikbas Y., Erdogan M., Capan R. et al. // Optik (Stuttg). 2021. V. 245. P. 167661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167661
Bengasi G., Meunier-Prest R., Baba K. et al. // Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020. V. 6. № 12. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202000812
Klyamer D., Bonegardt D., Krasnov P. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 2022. V. 754. P. 139301. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSF.2022.139301
Curry J., W. Shaw Jr. R. // J. Phys. Chem. 1965. V. 69. № 1. P. 344. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100885a505
Bonderman P.D., Cater D.E., Bennett E.W. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2002. V. 15. № 3. P. 396. https://doi.org/10.1021/je60046a004
Yase K., Takahashi Y., NorihikoArakato et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1995. V. 34. P. 636. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.34.636
Шаулов Ю.Х., Лопаткина И.Л., Кирюхин И.А. et al. // Журн. физ. химии. 1975. Т. 49. № 1. С. 252.
Шаулов Ю.Х., Приселков Ю.А., Лопаткина И.Л., Маркова И.Я. // Журн. физ. химии. 1972. Т. 46. № 4. С. 857.
Semyannikov P.P., Basova T.V., Grankin V.M. et al. // J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines. 2000. V. 4. № 3. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1409(200004/0-5)4:3<271::AID-JPP205>3.3.CO;2-W
Plyashkevich V., Basova T., Semyannikov P. et al. // Thermochim. Acta. 2010. V. 501. № 1–2. P. 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TCA.2010.01.019
Kol’tsov E., Basova T., Semyannikov P. et al. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2004. V. 86. № 1. P. 222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.03.007
Semyannikov P., Basova T., Trubin S. et al. // J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines. 2006. V. 10. № 8. P. 1034. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1088424606000387
Basova T., Semyannikov P., Plyashkevich V. et al. // Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2009. V. 34. № 3–4. P. 180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408430903245377
Семянников П.П., Басова Т.В., Трубин С.В. и др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2008. Т. 82. № 2. С. 221.
Басова Т.В., Семянников П.П., Игуменов И.К. // Давление насыщенного пара фталоцианинов. СПб., 2007. С. 136.
Klyamer D.D., Sukhikh A.S., Trubin S.V. et al. // Cryst. Growth & Des. 2020. V. 20. № 2. P. 1016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01350
Erdoǧmus A., Nyokong T. // J. Mol. Struct. 2010. V. 977. № 1–3. P. 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2010.04.048
Гранкин В.М., Семянников П.П. // Приборы и техника эксперимента 1991. Т. 4. С. 129.
Lopatin S.I., Shugurov S.M., Tyurnina Z.G. et al. // Glas. Phys. Chem. 2021. V. 47. № 1. P. 38. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659621010077
Spackman P.R., Turner M.J., McKinnon J.J. et al. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2021. V. 54. P. 1006. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576721002910
Mackenzie C.F., Spackman P.R., Jayatilaka D. et al. // IUCrJ. 2017. V. 4. P. 575. https://doi.org/10.1107/S205225251700848X
Scheidt W.R., Dow W. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977. V. 99. № 4. P. 1101. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00446a021
Bonegardt D., Klyamer D., Sukhikh A. et al. // 2021. V. 9. № 6. P. 137. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9060137
Klyamer D.D., Sukhikh A.S., Gromilov S.A. et al. // Macroheterocycles. 2018. V. 11. № 3. P. 304. https://doi.org/10.6060/mhc180794b
Jiang H., Ye J., Hu P. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2014. V. 4. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07573
Erk P. // CCDC 112723: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination. 2004. https://doi.org/10.5517/cc3s97d
Ballirano P., Caminiti R., Ercolani C. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998. V. 120. № 49. P. 12798. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja973815p
Pugachev A.D., Tkachev V.V., Aldoshin S.M. et al. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2021. V. 91. № 7. P. 1297. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363221070069