Synthesis, structure and magnetic properties of Mn-substituted magnetite for magnetorheological materials

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Iron(II)-manganese(II) ferrite with the composition Mn0.3Fe2.7O4 was synthesized using the coprecipitation method (with various options for subsequent thermal and mechanical treatment of the precipitate). The material was studied by X-ray phase analysis, infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and magnetometry. The powder, which was fired in argon at 740°C (8.0 h) and high-energy grinding (1.0 h) at the final stage of synthesis, is a promising functional filler for magnetorheological materials. An oil suspension based on this powder shows a high shear stress value (3500 Pa at 625 mT). In addition, this powder has a high oil absorption capacity, which ensures sedimentation stability of the suspension.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yu. S. Haiduk

Belarusian State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: j_hajduk@list.ru
Belarus, Minsk, 220030

E. V. Korobko

Lykov Institute of Heat and Mass Transfer, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

Email: j_hajduk@list.ru
Belarus, Minsk, 220072

L. V. Radkevich

Lykov Institute of Heat and Mass Transfer, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

Email: j_hajduk@list.ru
Belarus, Minsk, 220072

R. P. Golodok

Belarusian State University

Email: j_hajduk@list.ru
Belarus, Minsk, 220030

A. E. Usenko

Belarusian State University

Email: j_hajduk@list.ru
Belarus, Minsk, 220030

V. V. Pankov

Belarusian State University

Email: j_hajduk@list.ru
Belarus, Minsk, 220030

References

  1. Беляев Е.С., Ермолаев А.И., Титов Е.Ю., Тумаков С.Ф. Магнитореологические жидкости: технологии создания и применение: монография. Нижегород. гос. техн. ун-т им. Р.Е. Алексеева. 2017. 94 с.
  2. Vekas L. // Adv. Sci. Technol. 2008. V. 54. № 1. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ASТ. 54.127
  3. Fang F.F., Choi H.J., Jhonb M.S. // Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2009. V. 351. P. 46.
  4. Chary T.R.G., Allaparthi M., Dusa S. еt al. // Intelligent Manufacturing and Energy Sustainability. ICIMES 2023. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Singapore: Springer, 2024. V. 372. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6774-2_46
  5. Корсакова А.С., Котиков Д.А., Гайдук Ю.С., Паньков В.В. // Конденсированные среды и межфазные границы. 2020. Т. 22. № 4. С. 466. https://doi.org/10.17308/kcmf.2020.22/3076
  6. Гордеев Б.А., Иванов Е.Г., Охулков С.Н. и др. // Вестник машиностроения. 2023. № 6. С. 499. https://doi.org/10.36652/0042-4633-2023-102-6-499-504
  7. Kordonsky W. // Materials Technology. 1993. V. 8. № 11/12. P. 240.
  8. Ghaffari A., Hashemabadi S., Ashtiani M. // J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2015. V. 26. № 8. P. 881.
  9. Костров С.А., Тихонов П.А., Музафаров А.М., Крамаренко Е.Ю. // Высокомол. соединения. Сер. А. 2021. Т. 63. С. 198. https://doi.org/10.31857/S230811202103007X
  10. Шульман З.П., Кордонский В.И. Магнитореологический эффект. Минск: Наука и техника, 1982. 184 с.
  11. Гордеев Б.А., Ермолаев А.И., Охулков С.Н. и др. //Вестник машиностроения. 2023. № 3. С. 192. https://doi.org/10.36652/0042-4633-2023-102-3-192-201
  12. Гареев К.Г., Лучинин В.В., Мошников В.А. // Биотехносфера. 2013. Т. 5. № 29. С. 2.
  13. Lu A.-H., Salabas E.L., Schutz F. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007. V. 46. № 8. P. 1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200602866
  14. Новопашин С.А., Серебрякова М.А., Хмель С.Я. // Теплофизика и аэромеханика.2015. Т. 22. № 4. С. 411.
  15. Gupta A.K., Naregalkar R.R., Vaidya V. еt al. // Nanomedicine. 2007. V. 2. № 1. P. 23. https://doi.org/10.2217/17435889.2.1.23
  16. Mathew D.S.,Juang R.-S. // Chem. Eng. J. 2007. V. 129. № 1–3. P. 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2006.11.001
  17. Kciuk M., Turczyn R. // J. Achievements Mater. Manufacturing. Eng. 2006. V. 18. № 1–2. P. 127.
  18. Kumar J.S., Paul P.S., Raghunathan G., Alex D.G. // Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 2019. V. 14. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-019-0109-2
  19. Chiriac H., Stoian G. // IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2009. V. 45. № 10. P. 4049. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2009.2024633
  20. Pu H., Jiang F. // Nanotechnology. 2005. V. 16. № 9. P. 1486. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/16/9/012
  21. Manuel J.G. de Falco, Bombard A.J.F., Weeks E.R. //Smart Mater. Struct. 2023. V. 32. № 4. P. 045014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/acbb47
  22. Вест А. // Химия твердого тела. Теория и приложения. В 2-х ч. / Пер. с англ. М.: Мир, 1988. Ч. 1. 558 с.
  23. Skumryev V., Stoyanov S., Zhang Y. еt al. // Nature. 2003. V. 423. № 6942. P. 850. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01687
  24. Першина А.Г., Сазонов А.Э., Мильто И.В. // Бюллетень сибирской медицины. 2008. Т. 7. № 2. С. 70. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2008-2-70-78

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Dependence of the saturation magnetization of MxFe3-xO4 on the degree of substitution (x) at 5 and 300 K [5].

Download (100KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Diffractograms (a) and IR spectra (b) of powders of Mn0.3Fe2.7O4 composition after drying at 120С (1), firing at 740С (2), firing at 740С and subsequent high-energy grinding for 0.5 (3) and 1.0 h (4).

Download (194KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Dependences of saturation magnetization of Mn0.3Fe2.7O4 on magnetic field strength: powder after firing in air for 2.0 h at 300С (a), after firing in argon for 8.0 h at 740С (b).

Download (135KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. SEM images of Mn0.3Fe2.7O4 powder before (a, b) and after (c) high-energy grinding in a ball disperser.

Download (1MB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 5. Shear stress dependences of Mn0.3Fe2.7O4-based MRZh-4 (after firing at 740С and grinding for 1.0 h) at different shear rates and given values of magnetic induction (a, b) and flow curves (c).

Download (321KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences