Diethyl Sulfide Oxidation with Sodium Peroxoborate in Water–Acetonitrile System. Kinetics and Mechanism

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

In aqueous solutions of acetonitrile (1 vol%), the rate of oxidation of diethyl sulfide with sodium peroxoborate, Na2[B2(O2)2(OH)4]∙6H2O, in the pH range of 8.5–11 is significantly higher than the oxidation rate in water and exceeds the rate of reaction of Et2S with hydrogen peroxide in the H2O–MeCN system. The reaction order with respect to the substrate, which is close to zero, suggests that the limiting stage of the process is the reaction of peroxoborate anions with MeCN, leading to the formation of active boron peroxyimidates, which then react in a rapid stage with Et2S.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

А. K. Liubymova

L. M. Litvinenko Institute of Physical Organic and Coal Chemistry

Author for correspondence.
Email: lobachev.vl51@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Donetsk

V. L. Lobachev

L. M. Litvinenko Institute of Physical Organic and Coal Chemistry

Email: lobachev.vl51@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Donetsk

T. V. Bezbozhnaya

L. M. Litvinenko Institute of Physical Organic and Coal Chemistry

Email: lobachev.vl51@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7905-6546
Russian Federation, Donetsk

References

  1. Wagner G.W., Yang Y.C. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002. Vol. 41. N 8. Р. 1925. doi: 10.1021/ie010732f
  2. Zhao S., Xi H., Zuo Y., Wang Q., Wang Z., Yan Z. // J. Hazard. Mater. 2018. Vol. 344. P. 136. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.055
  3. Анисимов А.В., Тараканова А.В. // Рос. хим. ж. 2008. T. 52. № 4. C. 32; Anisimov A.V., Tarakanova A.V. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2009. Vol. 79. N 6. P. 1264. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363209060437
  4. Rajendran A., Cui T., Fan H., Yang Z., Feng J., Li W. // J. Mater. Chem. (A). 2020. Vol. 8. P. 2246. doi: 10.1039/c9ta12555h
  5. Fernández I., Khiar N. // Chem. Rev. 2003. Vol. 103. N 9. P. 3651. doi: 10.1021/cr990372u
  6. Kupwade R.V. // J. Chem. Rev. 2019. Vol. 1. N 2. P. 99. doi: 10.33945/SAMI/JCR.2019.1.99113
  7. Das R., Chakraborty D. // Tetrahedron Lett. 2010. Vol. 51. N 48. P. 6255. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.09.081
  8. Burgess J., Hubbard C.D. // Adv. Inorg. Chem. 2013. Vol. 65. P. 217. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-404582-8.00006-7
  9. Davies D.M., Deary M.E., Quill K., Smith R.A. // Chem. Eur. J. 2005. Vol. 11. N 12. P. 3552. doi: 10.1002/chem.200401209
  10. Durrant M.C., Davies D.M., Deary M.E. // Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011. Vol. 9. N 20. P. 7249. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06142a
  11. Лобачев В.Л., Зимцева Г.П., Матвиенко Я.В., Рудаков Е.С.// Теорет. и эксперим. химия. 2007. T. 43. № 1. C. 38; Lobachev V.L., Zimtseva G.P., Matvienko Ya.V., Rudakov E.S. // Theoret. Experim. Chem. 2007. Vol. 43. N 1. P. 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11237-007-0004-4
  12. Richardson D.E., Yao H., Frank K.M., Bennett D.A. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000. Vol. 122. N 8. P. 1729. doi: 10.1021/ja9927467
  13. Лобачев В.Л., Дятленко Л.М., Зимцева Г.П. // ТЭХ. 2012. Т. 48. № 3. C. 168; Lobachev V.L., Zimtseva G.P., Dyatlenko L.M. // Theoret. Experim. Chem. 2012. Vol. 48. N 3. P. 182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11237-012-9259-5
  14. Любимова А.К., Безбожная Т.В., Лобачев В.Л. // Кинетика и катализ. 2021. Т. 62. № 3. С. 296.; Liubymova A.K., Bezbozhnaya T.V., Lobachev V.L. // Kinetics and Catalysis. 2021. Vol. 62. N 3. Р. 342. doi: 10.1134/S002315842103006X
  15. Laus G. // J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2. 2001. P. 864. doi: 10.1039/b102066h
  16. Bethell D., Graham A.E., Heer J.P., Markopoulou O., Page P.C.B., Park B.K. // J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1993. P. 2161. doi: 10.1039/P29930002161
  17. Gillitt N.D., Domingos J., Bunton C.A. // J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2003. Vol. 16. P. 603. doi: 10.1002/poc.646
  18. Payne G.B., Deming P.H., Williams P.H. // J. Org. Chem. 1961. Vol. 26. N 3. P.659. doi: 10.1021/jo01062a004
  19. Лобачев В.Л., Дятленко Л.М., Зубрицкий М.Ю. // Кинетика и катализ. 2016. Т. 57. № 6. С. 751; Lobachev V.L., Dyatlenko L.M., Zubritskii M.Yu. // Kinetics and Catalysis. 2016. Vol. 57. N 6. P. 742. doi: 10.1134/S0023158416060094
  20. Вейганд-Хильгетаг. Методы эксперимента в органической химии. М.: Химия, 1969. 944 c.; Weygand-Hilgetag. Organisch-chemische experimentierkunst. Leipzig: Johan Ambrosius Barth. Verlag, 1964.
  21. Hansson A. // Acta Chem. Scand. 1961. Vol. 15. N 4. P. 934. doi: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.15-0934
  22. Вайсбергер А., Проскауэр Э., Риддик Дж., Туис Э. Органические растворители. М.: Инлит, 1958. 519 с; Weisberger A., Рroskauer E., Riddick J., Tuis E. Organic solvents. New York: Interscience Publ., Inc., 1955. 552 p.
  23. Рудаков Е.С. Реакции алканов с окислителями, металлокомплексами и радикалами в растворах. Киев: Наукова думка, 1985. 247 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Kinetic curves of Et2S oxidation by sodium peroxoborate in H2O-MeCN solutions at pH 8.48 (1), 11.05 (2). [PB] = 0.002 M., [CH3CN] = 1 vol%, N0S/Vg = 1.08-10-4 M., 25°C

Download (101KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Scheme 1

Download (43KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 2. pH-dependences of initial oxidation rates of Et2S at 25°C, N0S 8.4-10-7 mol, λ 2.12, [MeCN] = 0.19 M. (1 vol%). 1 - reactions with sodium peroxoborate in aqueous solutions ([PB] = 0.002 M.) [19]; 2 - in the H2O-MeCN-peroxoborate system ([PB] = 0.002 M.); 3 - in the H2O2-MeCN-N2O system [14]

Download (77KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Scheme 2

Download (66KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences