The manifestation of spin-selectivity of the singlet exciton decay into a pair of triplets in the kinetics of the exciton decay in rubrene films

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The kinetics of singlet fission (SF) (i.e. spontaneous splitting of the excited singlet state into a pair of triplet (T) excitons (TT-pair)) is known to be be essentially affected by TT-annihilation (TTA), which manifests in magnetic field effects on the TTA and, in particular, in the magnetic-field dependence of the SF-kinetics. In this work, within the two-state model (TSM), the method of treating the magnetic field effects on the SF-kinetics, which allows for the correct description of the manifestation of stochastic migration of Texcitons assuming that the manifestation results from transition from two states of coupled and freely diffusing T-excitons. Within the TSM the analytical expression for the magnetic-field-dependent part of the SF-kinetics is derived. This expression is applied to the analysis of the SF-kinetic measured in amorphous rubrene films in the absence magnetic field and in the field B = 8 kGs.

Негізгі сөздер

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

A. Shushin

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: shushin@chph.ras.ru
Ресей, Moscow

S. Umanskii

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: shushin@chph.ras.ru
Ресей, Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. M.B. Smith, J. Michl, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 64, 361 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110130
  2. D. Casanova, Chem. Rev. 118, 7164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00601
  3. K. Miyata, F.S. Conrad-Burton, F. L. Geyer et al., Chem. Rev. 119, 4261 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00572
  4. R.E. Merrifield. J. Chem. Phys. 48, 4318 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1669777
  5. A. Suna, Phys. Rev. B 1, 1716 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.1.1716
  6. A.I. Shushin, J. Chem. Phys., 156, 074703 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0078158
  7. V.V. Tarasov, G.E. Zoriniants, A.I. Shushin et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 267, 58 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00056-0
  8. A.S. Vetchinkin, S.Ya. Umanskii, Ju. A. Chaikina et al. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022. V. 16, P. 945. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793122050104
  9. A.I. Shushin, S.Y. Umanskii, Y.A. Chaikina. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. P. 860. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123040176
  10. A.I. Shushin, S.Y. Umanskii, Y.A. Chaikina. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. P. 1403. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793123060210
  11. S.Y. Umanskii, S.O. Adamson, A.S. Vetchinkin et. al. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023. V. 17. P. 346. https://doi.org/10.1134/S199079312302032X
  12. A. Ryansnyanskiy, I. Biaggio, Phys. Rev. B 84, 193203 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.193203
  13. T. Barhoumi, J. L. Monge, M. Mejatty et al. Eur. Phys. J. B, 59, 167 (2007).
  14. G.B. Piland, J.J. Burdett, D. Kurunthu et al. J. Phys. Chem. 117, 1224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp309286v
  15. G.B. Pilland, J. Burdett, R.J. Dillon et al. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/jz500676c
  16. A.I. Shushin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 118, 197 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(85)85297-0
  17. A.I. Shushin, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 3657 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460817
  18. A.I. Shushin, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1954 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.463132
  19. U.E. Steiner, T. Ulrich, Chem. Rev. 89, 514 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00091a003
  20. A.I. Shushin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 678, 283 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2017.04.068
  21. A.I. Shushin, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 034103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5099667
  22. K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications. (Plenum Press, New York, 1981).

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Comparison of the experimental RSS kinetics psex(t) for amorphous rubrene films at B ≈ 0 (circles) and B ≈ 8 kG (squares) [14, 15] with the theoretical dependence ps(t) calculated at B ≈ 0 (solid line) and B ≈ 8 kG (dashed line) using formulas (20)–(25). The calculation was performed for krs = 0.37 ns–1, vector z = (0.2; 1.44; 0.14; 1.7) and other parameters, as well as the same spin-lattice relaxation rates wc/krs = we/krs = 0.25 in the [TT] and [T+T] states. For comparison, the asymptotic dependence ps(t) ~ t–3/2 (dash-dotted line) is also shown.

Жүктеу (68KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024