Lipid-mediated effect of glycyrrhizin on the properties of the transmembrane domain of the E-protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The interaction of glycyrrhizin with the transmembrane domain of the E-protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (E-protein Trans-Membrane domain, ETM) in a homogeneous aqueous solution and in a model lipid membrane was studied using the selective nuclear Overhauser effect (selective NOESY) and NMR relaxation methods. The selective NOESY showed the presence of the interaction of glycyrrhizin with ETM in an aqueous solution, which is consistent with the literature modeling data, which indicate the possibility of penetration of the glycyrrhizin molecule into the channel formed by the ETM molecules. However, this conclusion is not confirmed by NOESY experiments in model lipid membranes, DMPC/DHPC bicelles. At the same time, the NMR relaxation method revealed the effect of glycyrrhizin on the mobility of both lipids and ETM molecules in bicelles. This suggests that GA affects the activity of the coronavirus E-protein indirectly through lipids.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

P. Kononova

Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University

Email: olga.gluschenko@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

O. Selyutina

Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: olga.gluschenko@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

N. Polyakov

Voevodsky Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: olga.gluschenko@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

参考

  1. Baglivo M., Baronio M., Natalini G. et al. // Acta Biomed. 2020. V. 91. № 1. P. 161.
  2. Tang T., Bidon M., Jaimes J.A., Whittaker G.R., Daniel S. // Antiviral Res. 2020. V. 178. P. 104792.
  3. Venkatagopalan P., Daskalova S.M., Lopez L.A., Dolezal K.A., Hogue B.G. // Virology. 2015. V. 478. P. 75.
  4. Schoeman D., Fielding B.C. // Virol. J. 2019. V. 16. № 1. P. 69.
  5. Mehregan A., Perez-Conesa S., Zhuang Y. et al. // Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Biomembr. 2022. V. 1864. № 10. P. 183994.
  6. Wilson L., Gage P., Ewart G. // Virology. 2006. V. 353. № 2. P. 294.
  7. Gupta M.K., Vemula S., Donde R. et al. // J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021. V. 39. № 7. P. 2617.
  8. Pervushin K., Tan E., Parthasarathy K. et al. // PLOS Pathog. 2009. V. 5. № 7. P. e1000511.
  9. Chernyshev A. Pre-print. 2020. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12286421.v110.
  10. G.A. Tolstikov, L.A. Baltina, V.P. Grankina et al. Novosibirsk. Geo Publishing (2007) (in russian).
  11. Shibata S. // Yakugaku Zasshi. 2000. V. 120. № 10. P. 849.
  12. Selyutina O.Y., Polyakov N.E. // Inten. J. Pharm. 2019. V. 559. P. 271.
  13. Fiore C., Eisenhut M., Krausse R. et al. // Phytother. Res. 2008. V. 22. № 2. P. 141.
  14. Sun Z.G., Zhao T.T., Lu N., Yang Y.A., Zhu H.L. // Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2019. V. 19. № 10. P. 826.
  15. Pompei R., Pani A., Flore O., Marcialis M.A., Loddo B. // Experentia. 1980. V. 36. № 3. P. 304.
  16. Hoever G., Baltina L., Michaelis M. et al. // J. Med. Chem. 2005. V. 48. № 4. P. 1256.
  17. Chrzanowski J., Chrzanowska A., Graboń W. // Phyther. Res. 2021. V. 35. № 2. P. 629.
  18. Bailly C., Vergoten G. // Pharmacol. Ther. 2020. V. 214. P. 107618.
  19. Fomenko V.V., Rudometova N.B., Yarovaya O.I. et al. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. № 1. P. 295.
  20. Kang H., Lieberman P.M. // J. Virol. 2011. V. 85. № 21. P. 11159.
  21. Sekizawa T., Yanagi K., Itoyama Y. // Acta Virol. 2001. P. 51.
  22. Baba M., Shigeta S. // Antiviral Res. 1987. V. 7. № 2. P. 99.
  23. Lin J.C. // Ibid. 2003. V. 59. № 1. P. 41.
  24. Duan E., Wang D., Fang L. et al. // Ibid. 2015. V. 120. P. 122.
  25. Harada S. // Biochem. J. 2005. V. 392. P. 191.
  26. Crance J.M., Leveque F., Biziagos E. et al. // Antiviral Res. 1994. V. 23. № 1. P. 63.
  27. Sui X., Yin J., Ren X. // Ibid. 2010. V. 85. № 2. P. 346.
  28. Wolkerstorfer A., Kurz H., Bachhofner N., Szolar O.H.J. // Ibid. 2009. V. 83. № 2. P. 171.
  29. Matsumoto Y., Matsuura T., Aoyagi H. et al. // PLoS One. 2013. V. 8. № 7. P. e68992.
  30. Selyutina O.Y., Shelepova E.A., Paramonova E.D. et al. // Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2020. V. 686. P. 108368.
  31. Selyutina O.Y., Apanasenko I.E., Kim A.V. et al. // Coll. Surf. B. Biointerfaces. 2016. V. 147. P. 459.
  32. Selyutina O.Y., Apanasenko I.E., Polyakov N.E. // Russ. Chem. Bull. 2015. V. 64. № 7. P. 1555.
  33. Ellena J.F., Lepore L.S., Cafi so D.S. // J. Phys. Chem. 1993. V. 97. № 12. P. 2952.
  34. Lepore L.S., Ellena J.F., Cafi so D.S. // Biophys. J. 1992. V. 61. № 3. P. 767.34.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Structural formula of glycyrrhizin. The asterisk indicates the proton that was excited in the sNOESY experiments.

下载 (59KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Fragments of 1H-NMR spectra for samples containing 1 mM ETM (1), 1 mM HA and 1 mM ETM (2), and sNOESY for a sample containing 1 mM HA and 1 mM ETM (3) in D2O; pH 3.5.

下载 (93KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Fragments of 1H-NMR spectra (1) and sNOESY (2) for a sample containing 1 mM HA in DMPC/DHPC bicelles; pH 3.5.

下载 (70KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Fragments of 1H-NMR spectra (1) and sNOESY (2) for a sample containing 0.5 mM ETM in DMPC/DHPC bicelles; pH 3.5.

下载 (81KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. Fragments of the 1H-NMR spectra (1) and sNOESY (2, 3) for samples containing 1 mM HA (1, 2) and 1 mM HA + + 0.5 mM ETM (3) in DMPC/DHPC bicelles; pH 3.5.

下载 (84KB)
索引源数据

注意

Х Международная конференция им. В.В. Воеводского “Физика и химия элементарных химических про­цессов” (сентябрь 2022, Новосибирск, Россия).


版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024