Dracontius on Homer and Virgil in the prologue to the Abduction of Helen

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of the late Roman poet Dracontius’ assessment of his literary predecessors, Homer and Virgil. Although their influence on this author is indisputable, there are very few direct indications of his personal attitude to the masters of the epic genre. In fact, the only such example is found in the prologue to the poem The Abduction of Helen. The small discourse, which fits into 20 lines, is usually interpreted by researchers as a praise of, or at least as a tribute to the poets of the past. At the same time, a closer analysis of some of its stylistic features and imagery used by Dracontius gives grounds for seeing irony behind the panegyric.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ivan M. Nikolsky

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: ivan.nikolsky@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6428-5357

кандидат исторических наук, доцент Института общественных наук

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Akbar Khan, H. 1967: An Interpretational Crux: Catullus LV and LVIIIa. L’antiquité classique 36 / 1, 116–131.
  2. Bisanti, A. 2017: Responsabilità e (de)merito negli epilli di Draconzio. Hormos. Ricerche di Storia Antica 9, 649–663.
  3. Boshoff, L.A. 2017: The Mythological Epics of Dracontius in their Socio-Political Context. PhD thesis. Oxford.
  4. Bretzigheimer, G. 2010: Dracontius’ Konzeption des Kleinepos‚ De raptu Helenae‘ (Romul. 8). Rheinisches Museum für Philologie. Neue Folge 153/3–4, 361–400.
  5. Bright, D.F. 1987: The Miniature Epic in Vandal Africa. Norman – London.
  6. Christiansen, P.G. 1970: Claudian and the East. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 19 /1, 113–120.
  7. Cichoń, N. 2016: The Judgement of Paris as Examined by a Lawyer and a Christian Moralist: Dracontius’ De raptu Helenae. Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae 26/1, 157–170.
  8. Díaz de Bustamante, J.M. 1978: Draconcio y sus Carmina profana, estudio biogr á fico, introducci ó n y edici ó n cr í tica. Santiago de Compostela.
  9. Galli Milic, L. 2016. Pâris, Hélène et les autres. Quelques considérations sur les personnages du Romul. 8 de Dracontius. Vita Latina 193–194, 193–217.
  10. Fielding, I. 2017: Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity. Cambridge.
  11. Henrichs, A. 1995: Graecia Capta: Roman Views of Greek Culture. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97, 243–261.
  12. Kaufmann, H. 2006: Intertextualität in Dracontius’ ‘Medea (Romul. 10)’. Museum Helveticum 63/2, 104–114.
  13. Malamud, M. 2012: Double, Double: Two African Medeas. Ramus. Critical Studies in Greek and Roman Literature 41/1–2, 161–189.
  14. Nikolsky, I.M. 2018: [Panegyric or Trolling? How Images of Animals Could Change the Main Message of Blossius Aemilius Dracontius’ ‘Satisfaction’]. Indoevropeyskoe yazykoznanie i klassicheskaya filologiya [ Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology ] 22/2, 967–974.
  15. Никольский, И.М. Панегирик или тонкая издевка? Как образы животных могли поменять смысл «Искупления» Блоссия Эмилия Драконция. Индоевропейское языкознание и классическая филология 22/2, 967–974.
  16. Nikolsky, I.M. 2019: [The Image of Carthage in Political Ideology of the Vandal Kingdom. ‘The Homeland of Asdingui’ or a ‘Phoenix Risen’]. Aristey [ Aristeas ] 20, 104–113.
  17. Никольский, И.М. Образ Карфагена в политической идеологии вандальского королевства: «матерь Асдингам» или «возрождающийся Феникс»? Аристей 20, 104–113.
  18. Nikolsky, I.M. 2020a: Images of Animals from Historia Naturalis in Political Rhetoric of Late Antiquity: Blossius Aemilius Dracontius’ Lion. SHAGI [ STEPS ] 6/1, 158–167.
  19. Nikolsky, I.M. 2020b: [Dracontius’ Mythological Poems and the Conflict of Political Elites in Vandal Africa]. SHAGI [ STEPS ] 6 / 2, 102–117.
  20. Никольский, И.М. Мифологические поэмы Драконция и конфликт политических элит в вандальской Африке. ШАГИ 6/2, 102–117.
  21. Nikolsky, I.M. 2021: [Christian Apologist or Roman Patriot? Dracontius and the Exempla virorum in His De laudibus Dei (LD III. 250–467)]. Vestnik drevnei istorii [ Journal of Ancient History ] 81/3, 649–658.
  22. Никольский, И. М. Христианский апологет или римский патриот ? Драконций и Exempla virorum в его «Хвале Господу» (LD III. 250–467). ВДИ 81/3, 649–658.
  23. Pleshak, D.G. 2021: Christianity, Polytheism and Memory in George of Pisidia. Vostochnaya Evropa v drevnosti i Srednevekov’e [ Eastern Europe in Antiquity and the Middle Ages ] 33, 220–223.
  24. Плешак, Д.Г. Христианство, язычество и память у Георгия Писиды. Восточная Европа в древности и Средневековье 33, 220–223.
  25. Pohl, K. 2019a: Dracontius: De raptu Helenae: Einleitung, Edition, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Stuttgart.
  26. Pohl, K. 2019b: Komik in den Dichtungen des Dracontius. In: K. Pohl (Hrsg.), Dichtung zwischen Römern und Vandalen. Tradition, Transformation und Innovation in den Werken des Dracontius. Stuttgart, 231–249.
  27. Romano, D. 1959: Studi Draconziani. Palermo.
  28. Simons, R. 2005: Dracontius und der Mythos. Christliche Weltsicht und pagane Kultur in der ausgehenden Spätantike. (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde, 186). Leipzig.
  29. Stoehr-Monjou, A. 2015: L’âme et le corps dans la suasoire de Dracontius: Rom. IX, un hommage à Homère. Vita Latina 191–192, 154–175.
  30. Stoehr-Monjou, A. 2016: Die Götter in der Ethopoiie des Dracontius (Romul. 4). Ein Versuch doppelbödiger Rede in der „Sprache des Romulus“? In: K. Pohl (Hrsg.), Colloque international sur Dracontius: ”Reddere urbi litteras”: Wandel und Bewahrung in den Dichtungen des Dracontius. Wuppertal.
  31. Tizzoni, M.L. 2012: The Poems of Dracontius in Their Vandalic and Visigothic Context. PhD thesis. Leeds.
  32. Tommasi Morescini, Ch.O. 2010: Roman and Christian History in Dracontius’ De Laudibus Dei. In: J. Baun, A. Cameron, M.J. Edwards, M. Vinzent (eds.), Papers Presented at the Fifteenth International Conference on Patristic Studies held Oxford, 2007. (Studia Patristica, XLIV–XLIX). Leuven–Paris–Walpole, 303–308.
  33. van Zyl Smit, B. 2010: The Amorous Queen and the Country Bumpkin: Clytaemestra and Egistus in Dracontius’ Orestis tragoedia. Akroterion 55, 25–36.
  34. Wasyl, A.M. 2011: Genres Rediscovered: Studies in Latin Miniature Epic, Love Elegy, and Epigram of the Romano-Barbaric Age. Krakow.
  35. Weber, B. 1995. Der Hylas des Dracontius: Romulea 2. Berlin–Boston.
  36. Wolff, É. 1996 ( é d.): Dracontius. Œuvres. T. IV. Poèmes profanes VI–X. Fragments. Paris.
  37. Yarkho, V.N. 2001 (ed.): Emiliy Blossiy Dracontsiy. Mifologicheskie poemy [ Blossius Aemilius Dracontius. Mythological Poems ]. Moscow.
  38. Ярхо, В.Н. Эмилий Блоссий Драконций. Мифологические поэмы. М.
  39. Zwierlein, O. 2017: Die ‘Carmina profana’ des Dracontius. Prolegomena und kritischer Kommentar zur Editio Teubneriana. Mit einem Anhang. Dracontius und die ‘Aegritudo Perdicae’. (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte, 127). Berlin–Boston.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences