Effect of lighting conditions on the reproductive success of platanthera bifolia (l.) Rich. (orchidaceae) on the northern border of the range (komi republic)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Abstract – The influence of illumination conditions on the reproductive characteristics of the rare orchid Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich has been studied on the territory of the Komi Republic, where the species is located on the northern border of its range. In 2023, five populations of the species were surveyed in habitats with varying of the level of canopy closure (from 6.5 to 82.3%). It was revealed that according to the gradient of increasing of the level of canopy closure, there is a decrease in the values of some indicators of reproductive success – the number of flowers, the proportion of generative plants and the main indicators of seed productivity.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

I. Kirillova

Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: kirillova_orchid@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Republic of Komi, Syktyvkar

D. Kirillov

Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: kirillova_orchid@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Republic of Komi, Syktyvkar

参考

  1. Zhang S., Yang Y., Li J. et al. Physiological diversity of orchids // Plant Diversity. 2018. V. 40. № 4. P. 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2018.06.003
  2. Abernethy A. Light regimes as a control of terrestrial orchid distribution in New Zealand: Dissertation. Christchurch: University of Canterbury, 2002.
  3. Shefferson R.P., Kull T., Tali K. Adult whole-plant dormancy induced by stress in longlived orchids // Ecology. 2005. V. 86. № 11. P. 3099–3104. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0586
  4. Jacquemyn H., Brys R., Jongejans E. Size‐dependent flowering and costs of reproduction affect population dynamics in a tuberous perennial woodland orchid // J. of Ecology. 2010. V. 98. № 5. P. 1204–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01697.x
  5. Tsiftsis S., Djordjevic V. Habitat effects and differences in the reproductive success of Orchis punctulata and Orchis purpurea (Orchidaceae) // Turkish J. of Botany. 2018. V. 42. № 4. P. 400–411. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1711-22
  6. Jacquemyn H., Brys R., Honnay O., Hermy M. Effects of coppicing on demographic structure, fruit and seed set in Orchis mascula // Basic and Applied Ecology. 2008. V. 9. № 4. P. 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.05.002
  7. Jacquemyn H., Brys R., Honnay O., Hutchings M.J. Biological flora of the British Isles: Orchis mascula (L.) L. // J. of Ecology. 2009. V. 97. № 2. P. 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01473.x
  8. Jacquemyn H., Brys R. Temporal and spatial variation in flower and fruit production in a food deceptive orchid: a five year study // Plant Biology. 2010. V. 12. № 1. Р. 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00217.x
  9. Kirillova I.A., Kirillov D.V. Effect of lighting conditions on the reproductive success of Cypripedium calceolus L. (Orchidaceae, Liliopsida) // Biology Bulletin. 2019. V. 46. № 10. P. 1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359019100157
  10. Кириллова И.А., Кириллов Д.В. Влияние условий освещения на репродуктивный успех Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz (Orchidaceae) // Экология. 2020. № 4. С. 311–315. [Kirillova I.A., Kirillov D.V. Effect of illumination conditions on the reproductive success of Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz (Orchidaceae) // Russ. J. of Ecology. 2020. V. 51. № 4. Р. 389–393] https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413620040098
  11. Вахрамеева М.Г., Варлыгина Т.И., Татаренко И.В. Орхидные России (биология, экология и охрана). М.: Тов-во науч. изд. КМК, 2014. 437 с.
  12. Kirillov D., Kirillova I. Platanthera bifolia (L.) Rich. (Orchidaceae) in the Komi Republic // GBIF. Occurrence dataset. 2023. https://www.gbif.org/dataset/0045633d-6abf-476b-9f76-9f1eff486d5c/project.
  13. Brzosko E. The dynamics of island populations of Platanthera bifolia in the Biebrza National Park (NE Poland) // Annales Botanici Fennici. 2003. V. 40. Р. 243–253.
  14. Jennings S.B., Brown N.D., Sheil D. Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures // Forestry. 1999. V. 72. № 1. P. 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/72.1.59
  15. Anderson M.C. Studies of the woodland light climate. 1. The photographic computation of light conditions // Journal of Ecology. 1964. V. 52. P. 27–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257780
  16. Mitchell P.L., Whitmore T.C. Use of hemispherical photographs in forest ecology. O.F.I. Occasional Papers. № 44. Oxford: Oxford Forestry Institute, 1993. 39 p.
  17. Mailly D., Turbis S., Chazdon R.L. SOLARCALC 7.0: An enhanced version of a program for the analysis of hemispherical canopy photographs // Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2013. V. 97. P. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.06.004
  18. Злобин Ю.А., Скляр В.Г., Клименко А.А. Популяции редких видов растений: теоретические основы и методика изучения. Сумы: Университетская книга, 2013. 439 с.
  19. Arditti J., Michaud J. D., Healey P. L. Morphometry of orchid seeds. I. Paphiopedilum and native California and related species of Cypripedium // American Journal of Botany. 1979. V. 66. № 10. P. 1128–1137.
  20. Healey P.L., Michaud J.D., Arditti J. Morphometry of orchid seeds. III. Native California and related species of Goodyera, Piperia, Platanthera and Spiranthes // American Journal of Botany. 1980. V. 67. № 4. P. 508–518.
  21. Кириллова И.А., Кириллов Д.В. Особенности репродуктивной биологии Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. (Orchidaceae) на северной границе ареала // Сибирский экологич. журн. 2015. Т. 22. № 4. С. 617–629. [Kirillova I.A., Kirillov D.V. Reproduction biology of Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. .Br. (Orchidaceae) on its northern distribution border // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2015. V. 8. № 4. P. 512–522.] https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425515040095]
  22. Brzosko E. Dynamics of island populations of Cypripedium calceolus in the Biebrza river valley (North-East Poland) // Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2002. V. 139. № 1. Р. 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00049.x
  23. Вrzosko E., Ostrowiecka B., Mirski P. et al. Pollinator limitation affects low reproductive success in populations of nectarless orchid in the Biebrza Nation al Park // Acta Agrobotanica. 2017. V. 70. № 1. Art. 1706. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1706
  24. Кириллова И.А., Кириллов Д.В. Динамика популяций, репродуктивный успех и сезонное развитие Cypripedium calceolus в разных условиях произрастания как ответ на действие погодных факторов // Сибирский экологич. журн. 2021. Т. 28. № 5. С. 590–602. [Kirillova I.A., Kirillov D.V. Population dynamics, reproductive success, and seasonal development of Cypripedium calceolus under different growing conditions as a response to weather factors // Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2021. V. 14. № 5. P. 472–482.] https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425521050061
  25. Boberg E., Ågren J. Despite their apparent integration, spur length but not perianth size affects reproductive success in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia // Functional Ecology. 2009. V. 23. № 5. P. 1022–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01595.x
  26. Bateman R.M., Sexton R. Is spur length of Platanthera species in the British Isles adaptively optimized or an evolutionary red herring? // Watsonia. 2008. V. 27. № 1. P. 1–21.
  27. Neiland M.R.M., Wilcock C.C. Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae // American Journal of Botany. 1998. V. 85. № 12. P. 1657–1671. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446499
  28. Claessens J., Kleynen J. The Flower of the European Orchid. Form and Function. Netherlands: Voerendaal, 2011. 439 p.
  29. Sonkoly J.E., Vojtkó A., Török P. et al. Higher seed number compensates for lower fruit-set of deceptive orchids // Journal of Ecology. 2015. V. 104. № 2. P. 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12511
  30. Arditti J., Ghani A.K.A. Tansley Review No. 110. Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications // New Phytologist. 2000. V. 145. № 3. P. 367–421. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00587.x
  31. Кириллова И.А., Кириллов Д.В. Calypso bulbosa (Orchidaceae) на северной границе ареала (Республика Коми, Россия): структура популяций и семенная продуктивность // Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука. 2023. T. 8. №2. С. 81–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2023.017
  32. Langvall O., Löfvenius M.O. Effect of shelterwood density on nocturnal near-ground temperature, frost injury risk and budburst date of Norway spruce // Forest Ecology and Management. 2002. V. 168. № 1–3. Р. 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00754-X

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Relationship between the degree of shading and seed productivity of Platanthera bifolia.

下载 (146KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024