Application of dual-wavelength digital holographic interferometry for optical nondestructive wear testing of protective elements of the spherical tokamak Globus-M2

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The possibility of using the method of dual-wavelength digital holographic interferometry to assess the wear of protective elements of the Globus-M2 spherical tokamak after working plasma discharges is demonstrated. At this stage of the work, the protective elements were removed from the tokamak discharge chamber and used as samples in the holographic setup. A diagram of a holographic interferometer for recording primary holographic images is presented, in which control of the radiation wavelength recording and monitoring systems is carried out through a hardware and software complex in real time. The results of measurements of the shape of tokamak elements are presented. It is shown that when the difference in wavelengths changes, the sensitivity of the measurement method changes, and in the proposed configuration of the optical scheme it is possible to determine the minimum value of the shape change at a level of 10–30 μm. At the same time, the error in determining the phase difference, by which the surface profile is assessed, in the digital method can reach about 2π/40.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

I. Alekseenko

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: IAlekseenko@kantiana.ru
Ресей, Kaliningrad, 236041

A. Kozhevnikova

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: IAlekseenko@kantiana.ru
Ресей, Kaliningrad, 236041

A. Razdobarin

Ioffe Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: IAlekseenko@kantiana.ru
Ресей, St. Petersburg, 194021

D. Elets

Ioffe Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: IAlekseenko@kantiana.ru
Ресей, St. Petersburg, 194021

O. Medvedev

Ioffe Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: IAlekseenko@kantiana.ru
Ресей, St. Petersburg, 194021

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. De Temmerman G., Hirai T., Pitts R.A. // Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion. 2018. V. 60. P. 044018. doi: 10.1088/1361-6587/aaaf62.
  2. Schweer B., Huber A., Sergienko G., Philipps V., Irrek F., Esser H.G., Samm U., Kempenaars M., Stamp M., Gowers C., Richards D. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2005. V. 337–339. P. 570. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.156.
  3. Pintsuk G., Bobin-Vastra I., Constans S., Gavila P., Rödig M., Riccardi B. // Fusion Eng. Des. 2013. V. 88. P. 1858. doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.05.091.
  4. Кукушкин А.С., Пшенов А.А. // Физика плазмы. 2021. Т. 47. С. 1123.
  5. Pedrini G., Alekseenko I., Jagannathan G., Kempenaars M., Vayakis G., Osten W. // Applied Optics. 2019. V. 8(5). P. A147.
  6. Belashov A.V., Zhikhoreva A.A., Semenova I.V. // Applied Sciences. 2022. V. 12. P. 1687.
  7. Kozhevnikova A.M., Alekseenko I.V., Schitz D.V. // Applied Optics. 2023. Т. 62. С. 7881.
  8. Friesem A.A., Levy U. // Applied Optics. 1976. V. 15. P. 3009.
  9. Claus D., Alekseenko I., Grabherr M., Pedrini G., Hibst R. // Light: Advanced Manufacturing. 2021. V. 2(4). P. 403.
  10. Schnars U., Jueptner W. Digital holography: digital hologram recording, numerical reconstruction, and related techniques. Berlin: Springer, 2005.
  11. Takeda M., Ina H., Kobayashi S. // J. Optical Soc. America. 1982. V. 72.1. P. 156.
  12. Kreis T. Handbook of holographic interferometry: optical and digital methods. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
  13. Claus D., Alekseenko I., Grabherr M., Pedrini G., Hibst R. // Light: Advanced Manufacturing. 2021. V. 2. P. 29.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the digital holographic interferometer: 1 – pump laser; 2 – tunable laser; 3 – beam splitter; 4 – collimator; 5 – optical wedge; 6 – object; 7 – collecting lens; 8 – diaphragm; 9 – beam splitter; 10, 11 – mirror; 12 – collecting lens/microlens; 13 – CCD camera.

Жүктеу (16KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Algorithm for reconstructing the phase difference in two-wavelength digital holographic interferometry.

Жүктеу (25KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Test object (step structure).

Жүктеу (18KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Results of measuring the shape of the test object: interferogram corresponding to the synthesized wavelength Λ = 7.56 mm (a); reconstructed profile of the steps of the test object representation of the surface of the object (b).

Жүктеу (33KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Results of measuring the shape of OPE-1: image of an element with revealed surface defects (a); interferogram corresponding to the synthesized wavelength Λ = 400 μm (b); three-dimensional reconstructed representation of the object’s surface (c); two-dimensional distribution of the surface (d).

Жүктеу (59KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Results of measuring the OPE-1 profile: along line 1 (a), along line 2 (b).

Жүктеу (28KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Results of the reconstruction of the OPE-2 shape: image of an element with revealed surface defects (a); interferogram corresponding to the synthesized wave length Λ = 1.48 mm (b); three-dimensional reconstructed representation of the object’s surface (c); two-dimensional distribution of the surface (d).

Жүктеу (57KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 8. Results of measuring the OPE-2 profile: along line 1 (a), along line 2 (b)

Жүктеу (29KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024