What Would Malinowski Do? Classic Fieldwork in Online Fieldsites

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article examines methodological projects for research within online settings, the authors of which used images of classical, or conservative, fieldwork to design methods of digital anthropology. Digital anthropologists address various conceptual and pragmatic aspects of the fieldsite, fieldwork, and ethnography, rethinking the production of anthropological knowledge for internet research. Denying the possibility of applying classical fieldwork techniques in online settings, anthropologists engaged in virtual ethnography and user experience research have prepared an intellectual context for the anthropology of virtual worlds and social media and its methodological projects for digital fieldwork. Description of the classical fieldsite, including the version by B. Malinowski, influenced anthropologists to conceptualize the digital field, remove the ontological distinction between a real and virtual place, and problematize the anthropologist's position as an avatar and user. In conclusion, this methodological strategy is situated within a discussion of the political and epistemological dimensions of the field and ethnography. The author shows that methodological projects based on the images of classical fieldwork have allowed digital anthropologists not only to substantiate the corporate identity of their research area but also to demystify field practice, re-establishing its pragmatic and conceptual foundations and critical potential.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Irina Prus

European University at St. Petersburg

Author for correspondence.
Email: prus.irene@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7478-1204

аспирант факультета антропологии

Russian Federation, 6/1A Gagarinskaya St., St. Petersburg, 191187

References

  1. Abdelnour-Nocera, J.L. 2002. Ethnography and Hermeneutics in Cybercultural Research Accessing IRC Virtual Communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00146.x
  2. Abidin, C., and G. de Seta. 2020. Private Messages from the Field: Confessions on Digital Ethnography and Its Discomforts. Journal of Digital Social Research 2 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v2i1.35
  3. Airoldi, M. 2018. Ethnography and the Digital Fields of Social Media. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (6): 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1465622
  4. Alekseevskii, M.D. 2010. Internet v fol’klore ili fol’klor v Internete? (Sovremennaia fol’kloristika i virtual’naia real’nost’) [Internet in Folklore or Folklore in Internet: Modern Folkloristics and Virtual Reality]. In Ot kongressa k kongressu. Navstrechu Vtoromu Vserossiiskomu kongressu fol’kloristov: sbornik materialov [From Congress to Congress: Towards the Second All-Russian Congress of Folklorists: A Collection of Materials], edited by V.E. Dobrovolskaia and A.S. Kargin, 151–166. Moscow: Gosudarstvennyi respublikanskii tsentr russkogo fol’klora.
  5. Astuti, R. 2017. On Keeping up the Tension Between Fieldwork and Ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1): 9–14. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.003
  6. Baym, N.K. 2000. Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
  7. Beaulieu, A. 2004. Mediating Ethnography: Objectivity and the Making of Ethnographies of the Internet. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 18 (2–3): 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269172042000249264
  8. Bluteau, J.M. 2021. Legitimising Digital Anthropology Through Immersive Cohabitation: Becoming an Observing Participant in a Blended Digital Landscape. Ethnography 22 (2): 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138119881165
  9. Boellstorff, T. 2008. Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  10. Boellstorff, T. 2016. For Whom the Ontology Turns Theorizing the Digital Real. Current Anthropology 57 (4): 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1086/687362
  11. Boellstorff, T., B. Nardi, C. Pearce, and T.L. Taylor. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  12. Breglia, L. 2009. The “Work” of Ethnographic Fieldwork. In Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, edited by J.D. Faubion and G.E. Marcus, 129–142. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  13. Brubaker, R. 2023. Hyperconnectivity and Its Discontents. Hoboken: Polity.
  14. Caliandro, A. 2018. Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 47 (5): 551–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617702960
  15. Carter, D. 2005. Living in Virtual Communities: An Ethnography of Human Relationships in Cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society 8 (2): 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146235
  16. Cherny, L. 1999. Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  17. Clifford, J. 1997. Spatial Practices: Fieldwork, Travel, and the Disciplining of Anthropology. In Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, edited by A. Gupta and J. Ferguson, 185–222. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. Comaroff, J., and J. Comaroff. 1992. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder: Westview Press.
  19. Correll, S. 1995. The Ethnography of an Electronic Bar: The Lesbian Café. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24 (3): 270–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124195024003002
  20. de Seta, G. 2024. Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Folklore. In Research Handbook on Social Media and Society, edited by M.M. Skoric and N. Pang, 240–254. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  21. Evans-Pritchard, E. 1973. Some Reminiscences and Reflections on Fieldwork. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 4 (1): 1–12.
  22. Garcia, A.C., A.I. Standlee, J. Bechkoff, and Y. Cui. 2009. Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38 (1): 52–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839
  23. Glazkov, K.P. 2023. Paradoksy razrabotki geolokatsionnoi igry: vzgliad iznutri korporatsii [Geolocation Game Development Paradoxes: A Corporate Perspective]. Fol’klor i antropologiia goroda V (1): 108–126. https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-108-126
  24. Golovnev, A.V., S.Y. Belorussova, and T.S. Kisser. 2018. Veb-etnografiia i kiberetnichnost’ [Web-Ethnography and Cyber-Ethnicity]. Ural’skii istoricheskii vestnik 1 (58): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2018-1(58)-100-108
  25. Grandia, L. 2015. Slow Ethnography: A Hut with a View. Critique of Anthropology 35 (3): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X15588616
  26. Gupta, A., and J. Ferguson. 1997. Discipline and Practice: “The Field” as Site, Method, and Location in Anthropology. In Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, edited by A. Gupta and J. Ferguson, 1–46. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  27. Hine, C. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London: SAGE Publications.
  28. Hine, C. 2005. Research Sites and Strategies: Introduction. In Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet, edited by C. Hine, 109–112. Oxford: Berg.
  29. Hine, C. 2005. Virtual Methods and the Sociology of Cyber-Social-Scientific Knowledge. In Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet, edited by C. Hine, 1–13. Oxford: Berg.
  30. Hine, C. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
  31. Ingold, T. 2017. Anthropology Contra Ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1): 21–26. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.005
  32. Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
  33. Kozinets, R.V. 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  34. Ksenofontova, I.V., and A.A. Suslov. 2023. Etnografiia russkogo strima [The Ethnography of Russian Streaming]. Fol’klor i antropologiia goroda V (1): 127–146. https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-127-146
  35. Lysloff, R.T.A. 2003. Musical Community on the Internet: An On-line Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 18 (2): 233–263. https://doi.org/10.1525/CAN.2003.18.2.233
  36. Marcus, G.E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
  37. Marcus, G. 2003. On the Unbearable Slowness of Being an Anthropologist Now: Notes on a Contemporary Anxiety in the Making of Ethnography. XCP: Cross Cultural Poetics 12: 7–20.
  38. Marcus, G.E. 2009. Introduction: Notes Toward an Ethnographic Memoir of Supervising Graduate Research Through Anthropology’s Decades of Transformation. In Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, edited by J.D. Faubion and G.E. Marcus, 1–32. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  39. Marcus, G.E. 2012. Foreword. In Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method, by T. Boellstorff, B. Nardi, C. Pearce, and T.L. Taylor, xiii–xvii. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  40. Markham, A.N. 1998. Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.
  41. Markham, A.N. 2013. Fieldwork in Social Media: What Would Malinowski Do? Qualitative Communication Research 2 (4): 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1525/qcr.2013.2.4.434
  42. Markham, A., and N. Baym. 2009. Making Smart Choices on Shifting Ground. In Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method, edited by A. Markham and N. Baym, vii–xix. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  43. Miller, D. 2011. Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  44. Miller, D. 2017. Anthropology Is the Discipline but the Goal Is Ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1): 27–31. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.006
  45. Miller, D., and D. Slater. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. New York: Berg Publishers.
  46. Miller, D., and H. Horst. 2021. Six Principles for a Digital Anthropology. In Digital Anthropology, edited by H. Geismar and H. Knox, 21–43. Abingdon: Routledge.
  47. Nardi, B.A. 2010. My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  48. Paccagnella, L. 1997. Getting the Seat of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00065.x
  49. Pearce, C., and Artemesia. 2009. Communities of Play: Emergent Cultures in Multiplayer Games and Virtual Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  50. Pink, S., and K.L. Mackley. 2013. Saturated and Situated: Expanding the Meaning of Media in the Routines of Everyday Life. Media, Culture & Society 35 (6): 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713491298
  51. Postill, J., and S. Pink. 2012. Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web. Media International Australia 145 (1): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114
  52. Radchenko, D.A. 2023. Tsifrovaia etnografiia: sredi liudei i algoritmov [Digital Ethnography: Between Humans and Algorithms]. Fol’klor i antropologiia goroda V (1): 7–11. https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-7-11
  53. Rud, D.S. 2023. Onlain-soobshchestva moskovskogo retro: podkhod ekologii pamiati [Online Communities of Moscow Retro: Memory Ecology Approach]. Fol’klor i antropologiia goroda V (1): 147–177. https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-147-177
  54. Rutter, J., and G.W.H. Smith. 2005. Ethnographic Presence in a Nebulous Setting. In Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet, edited by C. Hine, 81–92. Oxford: Berg.
  55. Sanders, T. 2005. Researching the Online Sex Work Community. In Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet, edited by C. Hine, 67–79. Oxford: Berg.
  56. Shah, A. 2017. Ethnography? Participant Observation, a Potentially Revolutionary Praxis. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008
  57. Sluka, J.A., and A.C.G.M. Robben. 2007. Fieldwork in Cultural Anthropology: An Introduction. In Ethnographic Fieldwork: An Anthropological reader, edited by A.C.G.M. Robben and J.A. Sluka, 1–28. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
  58. Sokolova, E.K. 2018. Tela v Pokémon Go [Bodies in Pokémon Go]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 6: 37–53. https://doi.org/10.31857/S000523100002451-0
  59. Sokolova, E.K., and S.Y. Shevchenko. 2020. Tipologiia znaniia v biokhakinge [A Typology of Knowledge in Biohacking]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 1: 62–79. https://doi.org/10.31857/S086954150008758-3
  60. Sokolovskiy, S.V. 2020. Kiborgi v kiberprostranstve: sovremennye issledovaniia v oblasti kiber- i tsifrovoi antropologii [Cyborgs in Cyberspace: Contemporary Research in Cyber- and Digital Anthropology]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 1: 5–22. https://doi.org/10.31857/S086954150008752-7
  61. Sokolovskiy, S.V. 2021. Metodologiia i printsipy tsifrovoi antropologii [Digital Anthropology: Research Methods and Principles]. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniia 1: 200–214. https://doi.org/10.17223/2312461X/31/10
  62. Strathern, M. 2004. Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Wantage: Sean Kingston Publishing.
  63. Sumiala, J., and M. Tikka. 2020. Digital Media Ethnographers on the Move – An Unexpected Proposal. Journal of Digital Social Research 2 (1): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v2i1.37
  64. Taylor, T.L. 2006. Play Between Worlds Exploring Online Game Culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  65. Vakhrusheva, K.A. 2023. “Lishu tebia seksual’noi bezgramotnosti”. Kak ustroeny rossiiskie seks-blogi v Instagram [“No Sexual Ignorance”: The Structure of Russian Instagram Sex Blogs]. Fol’klor i antropologiia goroda V (1): 205–229. https://doi.org/10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-205-229
  66. Vozyanov, A.G., et al. 2021. Forum: opasnosti polia: perspektiva issledovatelia [Forum: The Dangers of the Field: The Researcher’s Perspective]. Antropologicheskii forum 48: 11–88. https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-48-11-88
  67. Wilson, S.M., and L.C. Peterson. 2002. The Anthropology of Online Communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Note

Facebook† и Instagram† - Принадлежат компании Meta, признанной экстремистской организацией и запрещенной в РФ.


Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences