Spectral Characteristics of Cardinal Vowels as Indicators of the Auditory Speech Feedback Control in Patients with Moderate and Moderately Severe Chronic Postlingual Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Chronic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is characterized by an increase in hearing thresholds at basic speech frequencies, which implies the auditory speech feedback control worsening and, as a result, changes of speech characteristics. A hypothesis was tested that such worsening can manifest itself in an increase of F0, F1, F2 formants of speech vowel sounds in patients with moderate and moderately severe postlingual SNHL. Recordings of elicited speech were performed for young and middle age women (36–59 years): 7 women speakers with moderate SNHL who did not use hearing aids; 5 women speakers with moderately severe SNHL who were hearing aid users but were not using them during the recordings; a control group of 12 normally hearing women speakers. An assessment of F0, F1 and F2 of stressed vowels [a], [i], [u] and calculations of vowels’ centralization indices – vowel space area, vowel formant centralization ratio and the second formant ratio (F2i/F2u), were performed. All the studied spectral indices in groups of patients with postlingual SNHL were similar to those in the control group, no statistically reliable differences were revealed.

About the authors

K. S. Shtin

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: misery01@ya.ru
Russia, St. Petersburg

A. M. Lunichkin

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: misery01@ya.ru
Russia, St. Petersburg

A. P. Gvozdeva

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: misery01@ya.ru
Russia, St. Petersburg

L. E. Golovanova

North-Western Mechnikov State Medical University

Email: misery01@ya.ru
Russia, St. Petersburg

I. G. Andreeva

Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: misery01@ya.ru
Russia, St. Petersburg

References

  1. Selleck MA, Sataloff RT (2014) The impact of the auditory system on phonation: a review. J Voice 28: 688–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.018
  2. Perkell JS (2012) Movement goals and feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in speech production. J Neurolinguistics 25: 382–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.011
  3. Bolfan-Stosic N, Simunjak B (2007) Effects of hearing loss on the voice in children. J Otolaryngol 36: 120–123. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2007.0009
  4. Dehqan A, Scherer RC (2011) Objective voice analysis of boys with profound hearing loss. J Voice 25: 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.08.006
  5. Schenk BS, Baumgatner WD, Hamzavi J-S (2003) Effect of the loss of auditory feedback on segmental parameters of vowels of postlingually deafened speakers. Auris Nasus Larynx 30: 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0385-8146(03)00093-2
  6. Subtelny JD, Whitehead RL, Samar VJ (1992) Spectral study of deviant resonance in the speech of woman who are deaf. J Speech Lang Hear Res 35: 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3503.574
  7. Naderifar E, Ghorbani A, Moradi N, Ansari H (2019) Use of formant centralization ratio for vowel impairment detection in normal hearing and different degrees of hearing impairment. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 44: 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2018.1545867
  8. Hilger AI, Kim SJ, Lester-Smith R, Larson CR (2019) Auditory feedback control of vocal intensity during speech and sustained-vowel production. J Acoust Soc Am 146: 3052 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5137580
  9. Weerathunge HR, Voon T, Tardif M, Cilento D, Stepp CE (2022) Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control. Exp Brain Res 240: 2155–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06395-7
  10. Luan Y, Wang C, Jiao Y, Tang T, Zhang J, Teng G-J (2019) Dysconnectivity of multiple resting-state networks associated with higher-order functions in sensorineural hearing loss. Front Neurosci 13: 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00055
  11. Husain FT, Carpenter-Thompson JR, Schmidt SA (2014) The effect of mild-to-moderate hearing loss on auditory and emotion processing networks. Front Neurosci 8: 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00010
  12. Coelho AC, Medved DM, Brasolotto AG (2015) Hearing loss and the voice. Update On Hearing Loss 103–128. https://doi.org/10.5772/61217
  13. Garnier M, Henrich N (2014) Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise? Comput Speech & Language 28: 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.07.005
  14. Tang P, Rattanasone NX, Yuen I, Demuth K (2017) Phonetic enhancement of Mandarin vowels and tones: Infant-directed speech and Lombard speech. J Acoust Soc Am 142: 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4995998
  15. Kawase S, Smith ML, Wright R (2019) Exploring the Lombard Effect in first language Japanese speakers of English. J Acoust Soc Am 146: 2843–2843. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5136861
  16. Ляксо ЕЕ, Григорьев АС (2013) Динамика длительности и частотных характеристик гласных на протяжении первых семи лет жизни детей. Рос физиол журн 99: 1097–1110. [Lyakso EE, Grigorev AS (2013) Dynamics of duration and frequency characteristics the vowels over the first seven years of life of children. Russ J Physiol 99: 1097–1110. (In Russ)].
  17. Бондарко ЛВ (1998) Фонетика современного русского языка. СПб. С-Петербург универ. [Bondarko LV (1998) Phonetics of the modern russian language. SPB. S-Peterburg Univer. (In Russ)].
  18. Nicolaidis K, Sfakianaki A (2016) Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 18: 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101155
  19. Mora R, Crippa B, Cervoni E, Santomauro V, Guastini L (2012) Acoustic features of voice in patients with severe hearing loss. J Otolaryngol-Head & Neck Surg 41: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2011.110150
  20. Vorperian H, Kent RD (2007) Vowel acoustic space development in children: A synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50: 1510–1545. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/104)
  21. Sapir S, Ramig LO, Spielman JL, Fox C (2010) Formant centralization ratio: a proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 53: 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0184)
  22. Sapir S, Spielman J, Ramig L, Story BH, Fox C (2007) Effects of intensive voice treatment (the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment [LSVT]) on vowel articulation in dysarthric individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease: acoustic and perceptual findings. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50: 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/064)
  23. Moura C, Cunha L, Vilarinho H, Cunha MJ, Freitas D, Palha M, Pueschel S, Pais-Clemente M (2008) Voice parameters in children with Down syndrome. J Voice 22: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.08.011
  24. Leder SB, Spitzer JB (1993) Speaking fundamental frequency, intensity, and rate of adventitiously profoundly hearing-impaired adult women. J Acoust Soc Am 93: 2146–2151. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406677
  25. Langereis MC, Bosman AJ, van Olphen AF, Smoorenburg GF (1998) Effect of cochlear implantation on voice fundamental frequency in post-lingually deafened adults. Audiology 37: 219–230. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099809072976
  26. Baraldi GS, Almeida LC, Calais LL, Borges AC, Gielow I, Cunto MR (2007) Study of the findamental frequency in elderly women with hearing loss. Rev Bras Otrrinolaringol 73: 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30082-3
  27. Lee GS, Lin SH (2009) Changes of rhythm of vocal fundamental frequency in sensorineural hearing loss and in Parkinson’s disease. Chin J Physiol 52: 446–450. https://doi.org/10.4077/CJP.2009.AMH074
  28. Nicolaidis K, Sfakianaki A (2016) Acoustic characteristics of vowels produced by Greek intelligible speakers with profound hearing impairment I: Examination of vowel space. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 18: 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1101155
  29. Hotchkin C, Parks S (2013) The Lombard effect and other noise-induced vocal modifications: insight from mammalian communication systems. Biol Rev 88: 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12026
  30. Luo J, Hage SR, Moss CF (2018) The Lombard effect: from acoustics to neural mechanisms. Trends Neurosci 41: 938–949. https://doi.org/10.106/j.tins.2018.07.011
  31. Kleczkowski P, Żak A, Król-Nowak A (2017) Lombard effect in Polish speech and its comparison in English speech. Arch Acoust 42: 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoa-2017-0060

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2.

Download (445KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 К.С. Штин, А.М. Луничкин, А.П. Гвоздева, Л.Е. Голованова, И.Г. Андреева