Category of “legal responsibility” in the context of its application to artificial intelligence systems

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article examines the category of “legal responsibility” from the point of view of domestic and foreign legal science, and also assesses the possibility of its application to the characteristics of artificial intelligence as an autonomous volitional subject and the possibility of endowing it with delinquency. Researchers practically do not touch on artificial intelligence as an independent delinquent subject of law, despite the fact that forecasts of the development of this sphere of public relations for the coming decades (in particular, the creation and implementation of strong artificial intelligence) indicate the need to consider such a category and its potential legal consolidation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey S. Zenin

Institute of State and Law of Tyumen State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: s.s.zenin@utmn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4520-757X

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Theoretical and Public Law Disciplines,Head of Institute of State and Law

Russian Federation, 38 Lenina str., 625000 Tyumen.

Ivan M. Yapryntsev

Institute of State and Law of Tyumen State University

Email: i.m.yapryncev@utmn.ru

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of Theoretical and Public Law Disciplines, Institute of State and Law

Russian Federation, 38 Lenina str., 625000 Tyumen, Russia.

Liliya V. Ivanova

Institute of State and Law of Tyumen State University

Email: l.v.ivanova@utmn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5255-3182

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of Criminal Law Disciplines of Institute of State and Law

Russian Federation, 38 Lenina str., 625000 Tyumen.

References

  1. Vitruk N. V. The general theory of legal responsibility. M., 2008 (in Russ.).
  2. Granin R. S. Ref. art.: Sutrop M. Problems of matching artificial intelligence with human values // Social and humanitarian sciences. Domestic and foreign literature. Series 3. Philosophy. An abstract journal. 2021. No. 3 (in Russ.).
  3. Izhaev O. A., Kuteynikov D. L. Artificial intelligence systems and non-contractual civil liability: a risk-oriented approach // Lex russica. 2024. Vol. 77. No. 6. Pp. 23–34 (in Russ.).
  4. Jonas H. The principle of responsibility. M., 2004 (in Russ.).
  5. Kuteynikov D. L., Izhaev O. A., Zenin S. S., Lebedev V. A. Algorithmic transparency and accountability: legal approaches to solving the problem of the “black box” // Lex russica. 2020. Vol. 73. No. 6 (163). Pp. 139–148 (in Russ.).
  6. Leist O. E. Sanctions in the Soviet Union law. M., 1962. Pp. 47, 48 (in Russ.).
  7. Matuzov N. I., Mal’ko A. V. Theory of state and law. M., 2001. P. 432 (in Russ.).
  8. Nersesyants V. S. General theory of law and state. M., 1999 (in Russ.).
  9. Novikov D. A. Labor Law and artificial intelligence: points of contact and discrepancies // Yearbook of Labor Law. 2024. No. 14. Pp. 156–174 (in Russ.).
  10. Ponomareva E. V. Subjects and quasi-subjects of law: theoretical and legal problems of differentiation: dis. … PhD in Law. Yekaterinburg, 2019. Pp. 11, 33, 70 (in Russ.).
  11. Saveliev Yu. M. On the concept of legal responsibility // Legal researches. 2015. No. 10. Pp. 61–80 (in Russ.).
  12. Syrykh V. M. Theory of state and law: textbook. M., 2012 (in Russ.).
  13. Hart H. The concept of law. SPb., 2003 (in Russ.).
  14. Hart H. L.A. Attribution of responsibility and rights / transl. from English by V. V. Oglezneva // Law studies. 2010. No. 5 (292). Pp. 116–135 (in Russ.).
  15. The pure doctrine of law by Hans Kelsen // To the XIII Congress of the International Association of Legal and Social Philosophy (Tokyo, 1987): collection of translations / transl. S. V. Lezova; res. ed. V. N. Kudryavtsev, N. N. Razumovich. M., 1987. Iss. 1. Pp. 164–166 (in Russ.).
  16. Bostrom N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. First. Oxford, 2014.
  17. Buiten M., Streel A., Peitz M. The law and economics of AI liability // Computer Law & Security Review. 2023. Vol. 48. P. 9.
  18. Hart H. L.A. The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1949. Vol. 49. Pp. 171–194.
  19. Hendrycks D., Mazeika M., Woodside T. An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.12001 (accessed: 15.07.2024).
  20. Ingarden R. Kniążeczka o człowieku. Kraków, 1972.
  21. Ingarden R. Über die Verantwortung. Ihre ontischen Fundamente. Stuttgart, 1970.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences