Historiographical and philosophical legal contexts in Criminal Law

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article discusses the problems of developing and improving historiographical approaches to the science of Criminal Law, which are a necessary prerequisite for strengthening and developing the philosophical and legal component in the structure of the scientific nature of Criminal Law. Insufficient attention to the problems of historiographical and philosophical legal studies of criminal law affects the general state and nature of this field of knowledge and social practice. A substantive and constructive-critical study of historiography and relevant contexts in the field of Criminal Law science shows the possibilities of significantly supplementing traditional ideas about the doctrinal content, conceptual structure, as well as the direction of development of the science of Criminal Law, which, in the context of the formation of the architecture of the modern multipolar world, should strengthen its cognitive and explanatory capabilities, demonstrate the stability and independence of domestic science. This is a conceptual understanding, in the terminology of P. A. Florensky, of the genetic series in the conceptual, linguistic and ideological-institutional environment of the science of Criminal Law, the nature and types of development of national criminal law literatures.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir S. Gorban

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: gorbanv@gmail.com

Doctor of Law, Head of the Sector of Philosophy of Law, History and Theory of State and Law, Head of the Interdisciplinary Center for Philosophical and Legal Studies

Russian Federation, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

Sergey V. Malikov

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: s.v.malikov@yandex.ru

Doctor of Law, Deputy Director 

Russian Federation, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

References

  1. Bochkarev S. A. Philosophy of Criminal Law: posing a question. M., 2019 (in Russ.).
  2. Vladimirov L. E. Criminal legislator as educator of the people. M., 1903. P. VI (in Russ.).
  3. Golik Yu. V. Criminal Law and Philosophy // Criminal Justice. 2022. No. 19. Pp. 5–11 (in Russ.).
  4. Zhizhilenko A. A. On the question of the past and future of the Russian science of Criminal Law // Law. Weekly legal newspa-per. 1915. No. 45 (November 8). Stb. 2858–2867 (in Russ.).
  5. Kudryavtsev V. N. Theoretical foundations of the qualification of crimes. M., 1963. P. 4 (in Russ.).
  6. Lyublinsky P. I. Literature review of the science of Criminal Law for 1908 // Law. Weekly legal newspaper. 1909. No. 26 (June 28). Stb. 1537–1548 (in Russ.).
  7. Makh E. Cognition and delusion. Essays on the psychology of research. M., 2003 (in Russ.).
  8. Nabokov V. D. On the question of the future orientation of the Russian science of Criminal Law // Law. Weekly legal newspa-per. 1915. No. 44 (November 1). Stb. 2773–2790 (in Russ.).
  9. Nabokov V. D. On the “dangerous state” of a criminal as criteria for social protection measures [1] // Law. Weekly legal newspaper. 1910. No. 18 (May 2). Stb. 1114–1123; [2]. No. 19 (9 May). Stb. 1173–1185 (in Russ.).
  10. Piontkovsky A. A. The science of Criminal Law, its subject, tasks, content and significance. Yaroslavl, 1895. P. 23 (in Russ.).
  11. Poznyshev S. V. The basic principles of the science of Criminal Law. The General part of Criminal Law. 2nd ed., rev. and add. M., 1912. P. 2 (in Russ.).
  12. Poletaev N. A. The science of Criminal Law in England // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1863. Vol. XVII. P. 363 (in Russ.).
  13. Polyansky N. N. Dispute about the future orientation of the Russian science of Criminal Law // Legal Herald. 1916. Book XIII (I). Pp. 155–168 (in Russ.).
  14. To be found guilty. The verdict of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg / preface by A. N. Savenkov, A. G. Zvyagintsev. M., 2021. Pp. 7–92. (in Russ.).
  15. Sergeevsky N. D. Philosophical techniques and the science of Criminal Law // Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1879. Book 1 (January – February). Pp. 39–87 (in Russ.).
  16. Standards of science and homo juridicus in the light of Philo sophy of Law: materials of the fifth and sixth philosophical and legal readings in memory of Academician V. S. Nersesyants / ed. V. G. Grafsky. M., 2011 (in Russ.).
  17. Chubinsky M. P. The science of Criminal Law and its constituent elements // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1902. No. 7. Pp. 99, 100 (in Russ.).
  18. Shargorodsky M. D. The results of the philosophical discussion and some questions of the science of Criminal Law // Soviet State and Law. 1948. No. 3. Pp. 12–20 (in Russ.).
  19. Berolzheimer F. System der Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilo sophie; Bd. 5. Strafrechtsphilosophie und Strafrechtsreform. München, 1907.
  20. Böhm D. Strafrechtliche Gesetzlichkeit als Prinzip? Eine Untersuchung über das Spannungsverhältnis zwischen positivrechtlichen und erkenntnistheoretischen Grundlagen strafrechtlicher Gesetzlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main, 2013.
  21. Bung J. Fünf Grundprobleme des heutigen Strafrechts // Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik (ZIS). 2016. S. 340–344.
  22. Ferrante M. Filosofía y derecho penal. Buenos Aires, 2013.
  23. Gardner J. Offences and defences: selected essays in the Philo sophy of Criminal Law. Oxford, 2011.
  24. Gierhake K. Fünf Grundprobleme des heutigen Strafrechts. Eine Replik zu Jochen Bung // Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik. 2026. No. 11. S. 733.
  25. Heydt R. Perspektivität von Freiheit und Determinismus: zugleich eine philosophische Untersuchung zur Objektivierbarkeit des Strafrechts vor dem Hintergrund neurowissenschaftlicher Forschung. Berlin, 2017.
  26. Husak D. N. Philosophy of Criminal Law. Totowa, NJ., 1987.
  27. Jhering R. Ist die Jurisprudenz eine Wissenschaft? Jherings Wiener Antrittsvorlesung vom 16. Oktober 1868 // Aus dem Nachlaß hrsg. und mit einer Einführung, Erläuterungen sowie einer wiss.-geschichtl. Einordnung versehen von Okko Behrends. Göttingen, 1998. S. 92.
  28. Kirchmann J. H. Die Werthlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft. Berlin, 1848.
  29. Kühl K. Die Bedeutung der Rechtsphilosophie für das Strafrecht. Baden-Baden, 2001. S. 53.
  30. Küper W. Strafrechtliche Beiträge zu Rechtsgeschichte und Rechtsphilosophie. Herausgegeben von Michael Hettinger u. Jan Zopfs. 2017.
  31. La crisis del derecho penal contemporáneo / Ricardo Robles Planas … (coordinadores). Sonst. Personen: Robles Planas, Ricardo [Hrsg]; Sánchez-Ostiz Gutiérrez, Pablo. Barcelona, 2010.
  32. Savigny F. C. Vom Beruf unsrer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg, 1814.
  33. Schild W. Ende und Zukunft des Strafrechts // ARSP: Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie. 1984. Vol. 70. No. 1. S. 71–112.
  34. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law / ed. by John Deigh and David Dolinko. Oxford, 2011.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1

Download (79KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2

Download (70KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences