Arbitration as a procedural form of protection of public interests

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article deals with the problem of protecting public interests in an arbitration court (arbitration). Arbitration is an independent element of the Russian system of protection of civil rights, freedoms and legitimate interests; acts as an alternative to state justice. At the same time, according to the established tradition, arbitration is considered as a non-state procedural form of protection of private rights. It is shown that when considering cases with the participation of the state by arbitration courts, not only private, but also public (state) interest is subject to protection. This circumstance should have a strong influence on the arbitration procedural form, but up to the present time, the procedural features of cases involving the state in arbitration proceedings are not regulated either by law or at the level of the positions of the highest judicial instances. The criterion for determining the arbitrability of civil law cases is proposed, the proposal to fix the participation of the prosecutor in the arbitration proceedings is argued.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Ekaterina Mikhailova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: e.v.mihailova@bk.ru

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Acting Head of the Sector of Procedural Law

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Alekseev A. S. Russian state law. Lecture notes. 4th ed. M., 1897. P. 578 (in Russ.).
  2. Alkhimenko V. V., Salishcheva N. G., Grishkovets A. A. Public interest in Administrative Law // Proceedings of the IGP RAS. 2011. No. 4. Pp. 98–129 (in Russ.).
  3. Vaskovsky E. V. Textbook of civil procedure. M., 2003. P. 371 (in Russ.).
  4. Vitsyn A. I. The Arbitration Court of Russian Law, historical and dogmatic reasoning. M., 1856. Pp. 15, 16 (in Russ.).
  5. Golmsten A. Kh. Textbook of Russian Civil Procedure. 5th ed., corr. and add. St. Petersburg, 1913. P. 154 (in Russ.).
  6. Grubtsova S. P. State participation in arbitration: theoretical and applied aspect // Russ. law: education, practice, science. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 31–36 (in Russ.).
  7. Zhestovskaya D. A., Tuzov A. G. From protection of public interest to protection of the victim’s interest // Criminal Justice. 2018. No. 11. Pp. 46–51 (in Russ.).
  8. Kazhlaev S. A. Achieving a balance of private and public interest in arbitration disputes // Journal of Russ. law. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 119–124 (in Russ.).
  9. Kazantsev A. O. The right of legislative initiative of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (in the context of the principle “no one can be a judge in their own case”) // Lex russica. 2017. No. 2 (123). Pp. 26–30 (in Russ.).
  10. Korkunov N. M. Lectures on the General theory of law. SPb., 2003. Pp. 226, 227 (in Russ.).
  11. Kukina T. E. Arbitrability of disputes related to the pledge of property rights contained in a state (municipal) contract // Herald of the Volgograd State University. Ser. 5. Jurisprudence. 2015. No. 3 (28). Pp. 156–160 (in Russ.).
  12. Mikhailova E. V. Problems of implementing the principle of independence of judges when considering cases of a public legal nature // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2021. No. 6. Pp. 49– 53 (in Russ.).
  13. Mikhailova E. V. Arbitration Court (arbitration) // Nationwide interactive encyclopedic portal “Knowledge”. 2022. No. 7, serial number 13. doi: 10.54972/00000013_2022_7_13 (in Russ.).
  14. Mikhailova E. V. The functions of the prosecutor in the sphere of civil jurisdiction need to be strengthened // Legality. 2021. No. 8 (1042). Pp. 27–34 (in Russ.).
  15. Scientific and practical commentary of the CPC of the RSFSR / ed. by R. F. Kallistratova, L. F. Lesnitskaya, V. K. Puchinsky. M., 1976. P. 572 (in Russ.).
  16. Nefediev E. A. Textbook of Russian Civil Procedure. 3rd ed. M., 1908. P. 343 (in Russ.).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024