A Network Approach to Studying Global Value Chains: The Case of the Balkan Peninsula
- Autores: Chimiris E.S1
-
Afiliações:
- Department of Economic Studies Institute of Europe RAS
- Edição: Nº 4 (132) (2025)
- Páginas: 162-176
- Seção: PROBLEMS OF ECONOMY
- URL: https://rjmseer.com/0201-7083/article/view/691013
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S020170832504014X
- ID: 691013
Citar
Texto integral



Resumo
The article attempts to identify structural characteristics of global value chains (GVCs) using the example of the Balkan Peninsula through a network-based approach. The relevance of the chosen topic is connected both with the region’s advantageous geographical location in terms of logistics routes and with the growing investment attractiveness for new regional actors, particularly China. The choice of methodology is based on the fact that modeling the GVC network, considering the number and density of chains, allows for an assessment of the characteristics of economic integration within the region and the identification of key actors. Although the Balkan countries are not formally part of a single economic space, they engage in economic relations both among themselves and with EU countries and third countries. At the same time, EU countries serve as the primary economic partners for the Balkan Peninsula. This raises the question: to what extent can the region conduct an independent economic policy without the participation of EU countries? What role do new actors, such as Turkey and China, play in the development of the region’s GVCs? Are the Balkan countries leaning towards integration with the EU or towards developing an independent common economic space? The constructed models of GCVs networks make it possible to assess the degree of a country’s involvement in the region’s GVCs (degree of centrality), identify strong bilateral connections between countries, and evaluate the overall configuration of the model. As a result of the analysis of the region’s GVC models for recent period it was shown that Italy and Germany play a key role in shaping the region’s connectivity through value chains. Notably, the countries within the region also establish connections among themselves, with a distinct group formed by the former Yugoslavian countries. In 2021–2025 China played a significant role in expanding trade with several countries in the region. Additionally, Serbia’s role in the GVCs increased during the same year. Nevertheless, at this stage, considering the economic conditions of the regional countries, it is difficult to speak of a realistic possibility of forming an autonomous common economic space independent of the EU.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
E. Chimiris
Department of Economic Studies Institute of Europe RAS
Email: chimiris@gmail.com
Candidate of Sciences (Politics), Leading Scientific Associates Moscow, Russia
Bibliografia
- Варнавский В.Г. (2019) ЕС и Россия в глобальных цепочках создания стоимости. Современная Европа. № 1. С. 92–103. doi: 10.15211/soveurope1201992103
- Васильченко А.Д. (2024) Сравнительные особенности участия стран Северной Европы в глобальных цепочках стоимости. Современная Европа. № 6. С. 111–123. doi: 10.31857/S020170832406010X
- Гончарова К.С., Шеломенцев А.Г., Масюк Н.Н. (2023) Сравнительный анализ влияния глобальных цепочек создания стоимости на национальные экономики. Вестник МГИМО-Университета. № 16(4). С. 107–126. doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2023-4-91-107-126
- Кондратьева В.Б. (ред.) (2023) Промышленная политика в условиях трансформации глобальных стоимостных цепочек. ИМЭМО РАН, Москва. 190 с. doi: 10.20542/978-5-9535-0618-2
- Россия и страны Западных Балкан: особенности экономического взаимодействия (2024) Доклад № 93 / 2024. М. А. Максакова, М. М. Лобанов [и др.]. Под ред. С. М. Гавриловой, М. С. Лазовича, Д. О. Растегаева и др. Российский совет по международным делам (РСМД). НП РСМД, Москва. 52 с.
- Amador J., Cabral S. (2014). Global value chains: A survey of drivers and measures. Journal of Economic Surveys. Vol. 30. P. 278–301. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12097.
- Banga R. (2014). Linking into Global Value Chains Is Not Sufficient: Do You Export Domestic Value Added Contents? Journal of Economic Integration. No. 29(2). P. 267–297. doi: 10.11130/jei.2014.29.
- Coe N. M., Dicken P., Hess M. (2008) Introduction: Global Production Networks – Debates and Challenges. Journal of Economic Geography. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 267–69. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn006
- Freeman L. C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks. No. 1. 1978/79. P. 215–239.
- Gölgeci I., Gligor D., Bayraktar E., Delen D. (2023) Reimagining global value chains in the face of extreme events and contexts: Recent insights and future research opportunities. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 160. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113721.
- González-Álvarez M. A., Montañés A., Ruiz E., & Uku S. (2025). Economic convergence of Balkan regions towards EU. Journal of Applied Economics. No. 28(1). doi: 10.1080/15140326.2025.2460149
- Granovetter M.S. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 78(6). P. 1360–1380.
- Matusiak M., Radovanovic N., Rakhmatullin R., Stehrer R., Beraha I., Berner H., Boch M., Djuricin S., Graser G., Jovanovic B., Korpar N., Ljumovic I. and Marjanovic D. (2022) Analysis of Value Chains in the Western Balkan Economies – Enriching the Potential for Regional Cooperation in Priority Areas. Ed. by Matusiak M., Radovanovic N. and Rakhmatullin R., Luxembourg. doi: 10.2760/47718
- Newman M. (2010). Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Stavrova E. (2018) Balkans’s Agriculture Value Chain. Current Point of View. International Journal of Economics and Financial Research. Vol. 4. Issue. 8. P. 242–249.
- Trienekens J.H. (2012). Value Chains in Developing Countries: A Framework for Analysis. In M.P. van Dijk & J. Trienekens (Eds.). Global Value Chains: Linking Local Producers from Developing Countries to International Markets. Amsterdam University Press. P. 43–68. doi: 10.1515/9789048514991-003
Arquivos suplementares
