Email this article Rehabilitation forecast markers: complex assessment of damaged brain using electroencephalogram (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP)
- Authors: Shpichko A.I.1, Shpichko N.P.2, Bosenko S.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology
- Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology,
- Issue: Vol 23, No 1 (2020)
- Pages: 24-28
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://rjmseer.com/1560-9537/article/view/34230
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/MSER34230
- ID: 34230
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Identifying rehabilitatory prognosis markers while the patient is in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is an important diagnostic task that rehabilitation program depends on. Post-coma recovery procedures reintegrate functions of damaged brain regions in patients with consciousness disorders and aim for improving thalamocortical interactions in terms of neuroplasticity. In this paper we study electroencephalographic (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) data of 50 patients with post-coma consciousness disorders as a result of severe brain damage. The reasons for consciousness disorders in studied patients include acute blood circulation arrest, traumatic brain injury and brain hypoxia. Patients were diagnosed with EEG and SSEP on the day of arrival to ICU and between 35th and 45th day of their stay in the hospital. As a result of this study, we identified neuroplasticity markers related to rehabilitatory process on the basis of assessment of data produced by widely accessible neurophysiological methodologies.
Full Text
About the authors
Andrey I. Shpichko
Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology
Author for correspondence.
Email: ashpichko@fnkcrr.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4652-3259
SPIN-code: 9844-9888
кандидат медицинских наук, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории органопротекции при критических состояниях ФНКЦ РР
Russian Federation, MoscowNadezhda P. Shpichko
Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology,
Email: shpichkonp@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3289-6107
SPIN-code: 5092-0536
научный сотрудник лаборатории двигательной реабилитации, восстановления глотания и речи ФНКЦ РР
Russian Federation, MoscowSergey A. Bosenko
Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology
Email: bosenich@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9447-0622
SPIN-code: 3285-5759
врач анестезиолог-реаниматолог ФНКЦ РР
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Goldfine AM, Schiff ND. Consciousness: its neurobiology and the major classes of impairment. Neurol Clin. 2011;29(4):727−737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2011.08.001.
- Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med. 1994;330(21):1499−1508. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199405263302107.
- Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58(3):349−353. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.
- Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2020–2029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
- Gantner IS, Bodart O, Laureys S, Demertzi A. Our rapidly changing understanding of acute and chronic disorders of consciousness: challenges for neurologists. Future Neurology. 2013;8(1):43–54. https://doi.org/10.2217/fnl.12.77.
- Bender A, Jox RJ, Grill E, et al. Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(14):235−242. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0235.
- Lechinger J, Bothe K, Pichler G, et al. CRS-R score in disorders of consciousness is strongly related to spectral EEG at rest. J Neurol. 2013;260(9):2348−2356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6982-3.
- Fischer C, Mutschler V. [Traumatic brain injuries in adults: from coma to wakefulness. Neurophysiol Data. (In French)]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2002;45(8):448−455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6054(02)00295-7.
- Synek VM. EEG abnormality grades and subdivisions of prognostic importance in traumatic and anoxic coma in adults. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1988;19(3):160−166. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005948801900310.
- Houlden DA, Taylor AB, Feinstein A, et al. Early somatosensory evoked potential grades in comatose traumatic brain injury patients predict cognitive and functional outcome. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):167–174. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c031b3.
- Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Tirschwell DL, et al. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(3): 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000053643.21751.3B.
- González-García E, Vilela-Soler C, Romá-Ambrosio J, et al. The use of evoked potentials in the follow-up and prognosis of patients in coma following severe traumatic brain injury. (Article in Spanish). Rev Neurol. 2007;44(7):404–410. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5062.
- Carter BG, Butt W. Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(6):765–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-005-2633-1.
- Christophis P. The prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in traumatic primary and secondary brain stem lesions. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2004;65(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-44885.
- Sleigh JW, Havill JH, Frith R, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials in severe traumatic brain injury: a blinded study. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(4):577–580. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.91.4.0577.
Supplementary files
