Quality of life assessment in patients with acute limb ishemia
- Authors: Sinyavin G.V.1,2, Kosenkov A.N.1,2, Vinоkurоv I.A.1,2, Mnatsakanjan G.V.1,2, Odinokova S.N.1,2, Meshherjakov A.F.1,2, Belov J.V.1,2,3
-
Affiliations:
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin
- Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery (NRCS)
- Issue: Vol 23, No 2 (2020)
- Pages: 15-18
- Section: Expertise and rehabilitation
- URL: https://rjmseer.com/1560-9537/article/view/34594
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/MSER34594
- ID: 34594
Cite item
Abstract
Background. In conditions of permanent progress in the quality of surgical care in various areas of surgery, it is very important to allow patients themselves to evaluate provided treatment.
Aims: this paper analyzes the quality of life in individuals with acute lower limb ischemia who have undergone lower limb revascularization surgery.
Materials and methods. An assessment of the quality of life of 122 patients with acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) of II degree who were treated at the Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin from 2016 to 2018 (average age 72.1 ± 14.7 years) was performed. The quality of life was assessed using the medical Outcomes Study-Short Form (MOS SF-36) quality of life assessment methodology.
Results. When assessing the quality of life of patients, it was found that the psychological and physical components of patients’ health are significantly affected by the angiotropic effect of the affecting factor associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus. 1 month after surgical restoration of blood flow against the background of the initial embolism, 83.6% of the respondents who did not suffer from diabetes noted a persistent improvement in their General condition and quality of life.
Conclusion. This method of assessing the quality of life after surgical restoration of blood flow in patients with acute lower limb ischemia can be used in angiosurgical practice and clearly reflects of patient satisfaction with the treatment.
Full Text
About the authors
Gennady V. Sinyavin
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin
Email: siniavinegennady@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0358-8968
MD, PhD, Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAleksandr N. Kosenkov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin
Email: alenkos@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6975-5802
MD, PhD, Professor
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowIvan A. Vinоkurоv
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin
Email: docvin.med@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0433-2523
MD, PhD, Dоcеnt
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowGevorg V. Mnatsakanjan
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin
Author for correspondence.
Email: cordestro@yandex.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8402-4381
Russian Federation, 8-2 Trubetskaya street, Moscow 119992
Sanija N. Odinokova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin
Email: saniya_odinokova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5403-8456
Assistant
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAleksandr F. Meshherjakov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin
Email: alex_maf@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3825-6656
PhD, Dоcеnt
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowJurij V. Belov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow Сity Сlinical Hospital оf S.S. Yudin; Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery (NRCS)
Email: cordestro@yandex.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9280-8845
MD, PhD, Academician Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow