Analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer in the context of medical and social assessment
- Authors: Nizovceva O.O.1, Bizyarin V.O.1, Shishkova-Lavrus M.V.1, Kuznetsova E.A.2, Karasaeva L.A.3, Goryainova M.V.3
-
Affiliations:
- Main Bureau of Medical and Social Expertise in the Samara Region
- Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
- Albrecht Federal Scientific Center for Rehabilitation of the Disabled
- Pages: 65-70
- Section: Original study articles
- Submitted: 26.05.2025
- Accepted: 25.07.2025
- Published: 30.07.2025
- URL: https://rjmseer.com/1560-9537/article/view/680720
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/MSER680720
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FRNVTE
- ID: 680720
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer ranks third in incidence among all malignant neoplasms both worldwide and in the Russian Federation. In both international and Russian scientific sources, there are few publications addressing the use of laparoscopic technologies and the outcomes of colorectal cancer treatment in the context of medical and social assessment.
AIM: The work aimed to analyze the results of medical and social assessment in patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopically assisted surgeries.
METHODS: Data from the official statistical reporting form No. 7 for 2020–2024 on the activities of federal medical and social assessment institutions in the Samara region were used. The study included 192 patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted interventions for rectal cancer in medical organizations in Samara. Statistical methods and data extraction techniques were applied.
RESULTS: Among patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopically assisted surgeries, medical and social assessment determined group I disability in 40 cases (20.8%), group II in 100 (52.1%), group III in 48 (25.0%), and 4 patients (2.1%) were not recognized as disabled. Permanent disability status was granted to 47 patients (24.5%), including 13 patients (27.6%) with group I disability, 17 (36.2%) with group II, and 17 (36.2%) with group III.
CONCLUSION: Following laparoscopically assisted surgeries for rectal cancer, 97.9% of patients are assigned disability status, with groups II and I accounting for 75.0% of cases. These findings substantiate the need to develop individualized rehabilitation and habilitation programs for disabled patients.
Keywords
Full Text
About the authors
Oxana O. Nizovceva
Main Bureau of Medical and Social Expertise in the Samara Region
Email: centrdirector@yandex.ru
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, SamaraVictor O. Bizyarin
Main Bureau of Medical and Social Expertise in the Samara Region
Email: bizyarinvo@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4235-7521
SPIN-code: 3566-7270
Russian Federation, Samara
Maria V. Shishkova-Lavrus
Main Bureau of Medical and Social Expertise in the Samara Region
Email: marylavr@yandex.ru
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, SamaraElena A. Kuznetsova
Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Email: drkuznetsova@gmail.com
SPIN-code: 1546-6271
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowLyudmila A. Karasaeva
Albrecht Federal Scientific Center for Rehabilitation of the Disabled
Author for correspondence.
Email: ludkaras@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5621-0240
SPIN-code: 9544-3108
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, St. PetersburgMarina V. Goryainova
Albrecht Federal Scientific Center for Rehabilitation of the Disabled
Email: marinagoryainova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8904-8614
SPIN-code: 5822-2280
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, St. PetersburgReferences
- Berdov BA, Erygin DV, Berezovskaya TP, Titova LN, Karpov AA. Preoperative radiation and drug therapy for locally advanced and prognostically unfavorable rectal cancer. Radiation and Risk. 2017;1(26):60–77. doi: 10.21870/0131-3878-2017-26-1-60-77 EDN: VUVFUJ
- Karachun AM, Petrov AS, Samsonov DV, Petrova EA. The place of laparoscopic surgeries for colon and rectal cancer. Practical Oncology. 2012;13(4):261–268. EDN: PUHUOX
- Karachun AM, Petrova EA, Pelipas YuV, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: literature review and own experience. Issues of Oncology. 2015;61(6):861–866. EDN: UXLYZL
- Karpov OE, Maksimenkov AV, Stepanyuk IV, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic technologies in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer. Bulletin of the National Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov. 2016;11(2):49–53. EDN: WMPCZD
- Sidorov DV, Frank GA, Mainovskaya OA, et al. Results of surgical and combined treatment of rectal cancer. Russian Journal of Oncology. 2012;(3):4–7. doi: 10.17816/onco39927 EDN: PEXGWJ
- Chernichenko MA, Boyko AV, Sidorov DV, Petrov LO. Cylindrical abdominoperineal extirpation of the rectum: immediate results and unresolved issues. Research and practice in medicine. 2015;2(3):19–24. doi: 10.17709/2409-2231-2015-2-3-19-24 EDN: UJDPOD
- Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Haglind E; COLOR II Study Group. A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):194.
- Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al.; Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):655–662; discussion 662–664. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762
- Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al.; MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–1726. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2
- Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al.; COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus opens urgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477–84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7
Supplementary files

